Skip Navigation
Attorney General Bill SchuetteMichigan.gov
Michigan.gov Home
close print view

Schuette Moves to Expedite Appeal of Ruling on the Michigan Marriage Amendment

Contact: Joy Yearout 517-373-8060

April 4, 2014

 

            LANSING - Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette today announced he has filed a petition with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit, requesting they bypass an initial panel hearing and instead hold a single "en banc" hearing before the full panel of 15 judges. 
 
            "My responsibility as Attorney General to defend the Michigan Constitution and the voters' decision to define marriage is important, and the sooner we reach a final resolution from the courts, the better," said Schuette. "Advancing our case to a hearing before the entire panel of Sixth Circuit judges will move us forward more quickly, and minimize delays in ultimately reaching the U.S. Supreme Court.  This move also offers the added benefit of conserving taxpayer resources by shortening the timeline of the litigation."

 

            Schuette has filed a formal petition for initial hearing en banc with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit.  A hearing en banc involves presenting the case to the full court of the 6th Circuit for review, a step traditionally reserved for significant cases.  This process is permitted when new decisions conflict with previous rulings, and for questions of "exceptional importance" (Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35).
 
            "This option is not unprecedented." Schuette continued. "The Sixth Circuit previously granted a similar request for the Grutter case involving the University of Michigan Law School admissions policies."  
 
             The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit granted a request to advance to an en banc hearing prior to a panel hearing in the case Grutter v. Bollinger, which involved University of Michigan Law School admissions policies. 
 
            The 6th Circuit also granted a request for en banc consideration in Schuette v. BAMN, when two panels issued conflicting rulings.  A similar conflict situation is possible again with the four currently pending marriage appeals.  Cases challenging state marriage laws are currently scheduled for near simultaneous consideration in three other states within the 6th Circuit: Ohio (Obergefell v. Wymsylo), Kentucky (Love v. Beshear), and Tennessee (Tanco v. Haslam).  With four states appealing on similar issues, the potential for panels to disagree is likely to result in future en banc hearing requests.  Schuette's request accelerates this process.
  

Case Background

            On March 21, 2014, Schuette filed an appeal of a federal judge's ruling striking down Article 1, Section 25 of the Michigan Constitution, also known as the Marriage Amendment.  The amendment defining marriage was approved by 2.7 million Michigan voters in 2004.  U.S. District Court Judge Bernard A. Friedman ruled against the Michigan Constitution in DeBoer v. Snyder on March 21, 2014 following a two week trial to evaluate voters' decision to define marriage as between one man and one woman.  

 
             In contrast with other federal judges handling similar cases across the country, Judge Friedman did not stay his ruling pending the outcome of appeal.  Schuette filed an emergency request for stay and appeal on March 21, 2014 with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit.  On March 22, 2014, the 6th Circuit granted a temporary stay, following that decision by issuing a grant of a permanent stay (pending outcome of appeal) on March 26, 2014. 
 
            As a result, Michigan's Constitution remains in effect during the appeals process.
 
 

-30-

Related Content
 •  Schuette Files Child Abuse Charges Against Washtenaw County Man
 •  Schuette Announces More Than $500,000 for 5,600 Michigan Propane Consumers in AmeriGas Settlement
 •  Schuette Urges Congress to Support Legislation to Prevent Child Sex Trafficking on Internet
 •  Schuette, Wyant Announce Settlement to Stop Severe Odors from America's Largest Waste Incinerator in Detroit
 •  Schuette Announces Support for Federal Bills to Provide Restitution for Child Victims of Pornography: "Child Pornography is not a victimless crime"
 •  Schuette Charges Lapeer County Woman for Embezzling $460k from 136 Elderly Nursing Home Residents
 •  Schuette Offers Five Tips for Flood-Damaged Families to Avoid Scammers Attracted by FEMA Payments
 •  A.G. Schuette Commends Gov. Snyder's Signature on Bills Strengthening Sexual Assault Victims' Rights
 •  Schuette Announces $105 Million National Settlement with AT&T Mobility Over Cell Phone ‘Cramming'
 •  Schuette Announces Extradited Saginaw Man to Proceed to Trial for Running Massive Ponzi Scheme
 •  Schuette Praises Legislature for Passing Comprehensive Victim-Centered Bills to Fight Human Trafficking
 •  A.G. Schuette Marks National Bullying Prevention Month, Encourages Students to Use OK2SAY to Report Bullying, Cyberbullying
 •  Schuette Praises House Committee for Unanimous Passage of Legislation to Protect Patients
 •  Schuette Charges Manistee Co. Pair With Premeditated First Degree Murder in 1995 Cold Case
 •  Schuette Announces AG Investigation in Alleged Aramark Employee Murder-for-Hire in Chippewa County
 •  Schuette Secures $1.6 Million for Michigan in Historic Settlement with European-Based Drug Company for Unlawful ADHD Drug Marketing
 •  A.G. Schuette Joins Law Enforcement, Education Leaders to Announce Statewide Student Safety Initiative, OK2SAY
 •  AG Schuette Commends Senate Passage of Bills Strengthening Sexual Assault Victims' Rights
 •  AG Propane Investigation Update: Schuette Secures $100k Relief for Ferrellgas Customers, Goes to Court to Fight for AmeriGas Customers
 •  Schuette, Getting Charge Tennessee Man in Kalamazoo Rape Cold Case
QR code

Michigan.gov Home
PoliciesMichigan NewsMichigan.gov Survey


Copyright © 2014 State of Michigan