| Issued and entered this 2nd day of September 2003 by Linda A. Watters
Commissioner
The Office of Financial and Insurance Services (OFIS) has been presented
with several inquiries concerning the possible preemption of Michigan's
restrictions on prepayment fees and penalties. These inquiries have centered
on two questions: 1) whether MCL 438.31c(2)(c) is preempted generally
by Section 501(a)(1) of the Depository Institutions Deregulation and Monetary
Control Act of 1980 (DIDMCA); 2) whether Michigan's restrictions
of mortgage prepayment fees and penalties have been specifically preempted
when the loan is an "alternative mortgage transaction."
OFIS Position
- Section 501(a)(1) of DIDMCA, 12 USC 1735f-7a, does not preempt MCL
438.31c(2)(c). As a result, lenders that make loans secured by first
mortgages on residential property, except for certain alternative mortgage
transactions, are prohibited from charging a Michigan consumer a prepayment
fee or penalty in excess of or beyond the time restriction set forth
in MCL 438.31c(2)(c).
- The provisions of MCL 438.31c(2)(c) that limit the charging of prepayment
fees and penalties, in certain instances, are preempted by the Alternative
Mortgage Transaction Parity Act of 1982 (AMTPA), 12 USC 3802.
This bulletin outlines the limits of Section 501 of DIDMCA and the preemptive
effect of the AMTPA on provisions of Michigan law that prohibit or limit
the collection of loan prepayment fees or penalties.
I. Section 501 of DIDMCA
Subsection (2)(c) of MCL 438.31c contains Michigan's statutory
limitation on the ability of lenders to restrict mortgage loan prepayments
on first lien residential mortgages and provides, in pertinent part, as
follows:
MCL 438.31c(2)(c)
"In connection with the transaction, except a loan, insured or
guaranteed by the federal government or any agency of the federal government,
if the security is a single family dwelling unit, the lender shall not
do any of the following:
(c) Charge a prepayment fee or penalty in excess of 1% of the amount
of any prepayment made within 3 years of the date of the loan, or any
prepayment fee or penalty at all thereafter, or prohibit prepayment
at any time."
Section 501(a)(1) of DIDMCA expressly preempts state usury
laws applicable to first lien residential mortgages: "The provisions
of the constitution or the laws of any State expressly limiting the rate
of interest, discount points, finance charges, or other charges which
may be charged, taken, received or reserved shall not apply to any loan,
mortgage, credit sale, or advance" that is secured by a first lien
on residential real property. Federal regulation 12 CFR 590.3(c), states
however, that DIDMCA does not preempt a "limitation in state laws
on prepayment charges . . . or other provisions designed to protect borrowers."
The legislative history of DIDMCA's preemption provision clearly
indicates the intent of Congress to preempt state limitations on charges
included in the "annual percentage rate." The annual percentage
rate reflects the amount of finance charge for the credit. The finance
charge is the sum of charges, payable directly or indirectly by the person
to whom the credit is extended, and imposed directly or indirectly by
the creditor as an incident to the extension of credit. In 1991, the Attorney
General cited the legislative history to clarify the scope of the federal
preemption, stating in part, "In exempting mortgage loans from state
usury limitations, the Committee intends to exempt only those limitations
that are included in the annual percentage rate. The Committee does not
intend to exempt limitations on prepayment charges, attorney fees, late
charges or similar limitations designed to protect borrowers." (OAG
No. 6679, April 29, 1991)
Generally, prepayment charges are not deemed to be interest on the loan
but ancillary fees or penalties. That is, they do not reflect the actual
cost of credit but incidental expenses that a lender may incur in handling
a loan. Restrictions on the amount of those fees or penalties protect
borrowers from being required to pay excessive penalties or incidental
expenses not related to the cost of credit. Clearly, such limitations
on the charging of prepayment fees or penalties are not a part of the
finance charge for the loan.
A case decided on October 29, 2002 further supports this position. In
Nelson v Associates Financial Services, 353 Mich App 580 (2002),
the Michigan Court of Appeals held that the prepayment penalty limitations
of MCL 438.31c(2)(c) are not preempted by section 501 of the Depository
Institutions Deregulation and Monetary Control Act, 12 USC 1735f-7a.
It is OFIS' position that MCL 438.31c(2)(c) is not preempted by
Section 501(a)(1) of DIDMCA. Accordingly, lenders that make loans secured
by first lien mortgages on residential property, except for certain alternative
mortgage transactions, are prohibited from charging Michigan consumers
prepayment fees or penalties other than as allowed by MCL 438.31c(2)(c).
II. AMTPA of 1982
Through the AMTPA, Congress intended to create an environment in which
all "housing creditors," as that term is defined in 12 USC
3802(2), including state-licensed or state-chartered institutions, may
make, purchase, and enforce "alternative mortgage transactions"
in conformity with applicable federal regulations. The term "alternative
mortgage transaction" is defined at 12 USC 3802(1) as:
" . . . a loan or credit sale secured by an interest in residential
real property, a dwelling, all stock allocated to a dwelling unit in
a residential cooperative housing corporation, or a residential manufactured
home . . . [:] (A) in which the interest rate or finance charge may
be adjusted or renegotiated; (B) involving a fixed-rate, but which implicitly
permits rate adjustments by having the debt mature at the end of an
interval shorter than the term of the amortization schedule; or (C)
involving any similar type of rate, method of determining return, term,
repayment, or other variation not common to traditional fixed-rate,
fixed-term transactions, including without limitation, transactions
that involve the sharing of equity or appreciation; described and defined
by applicable regulation . . . "
Thus, AMTPA applies to all manner of mortgage instruments made by housing
creditors that do not conform to the traditional fully amortized, fixed-rate,
fixed-term, mortgage loan.
The preemption clause of the AMTPA provides that "[an] alternative
mortgage transaction may be made by a housing creditor in accordance with
this section, notwithstanding any State constitution, law, or regulation."
To qualify as a non-depository "housing creditor," a person
must comply with any applicable state licensing law. In making loans under
the AMTPA, housing creditors must also comply with applicable federal
regulations. The applicability of particular federal regulations depends
on the type of creditor making the loan: national and state-chartered
banks must comply with applicable regulations of the Office of the Comptroller
of the Currency (OCC - applicable regulations are 12 CFR 34.20 through
34.25); state-chartered credit unions must comply with those of the National
Credit Union Administration (NCUA); and all other housing creditors lending
under the AMTPA must comply with the regulations of the Office of Thrift
Supervision (OTS - applicable regulations are 12 CFR 560.33 through
560.35, 12 CFR 560.210, and 12 CFR 560.220) that govern alternative mortgage
transactions.
The OCC has explicitly preempted state laws that block commercial banks
from imposing prepayment fees or penalties in connection with alternative
mortgage transactions (12 CFR 34.22). This regulation applies only to
alternative mortgage transactions defined by the OCC as "adjustable
rate mortgages," which are extensions "…of credit made
to finance or refinance the purchase of, and secured by a lien on, a one-to-four
family dwelling…where the lender…may adjust the rate of interest
from time to time." Thus, the preemptive effect of this OCC regulation,
as applicable to state-chartered banks, extends only to this specific
type of alternative mortgage transaction (adjustable rate mortgages as
defined by 12 CFR 34.20), not all types of alternative mortgage transactions.
More recently, the OTS issued regulations which remove prepayment and
late fee rules from the list of OTS regulations that apply to certain
housing creditors, i.e., state-chartered thrifts and state-licensed mortgage
lenders) under the AMTPA. This action reverses the OTS' action in
1996 preempting state law restrictions on prepayment penalties and late
charges for state-chartered depositories and state-licensed mortgage lenders.
The final rule took effect on July 1, 2003.
This means that state-chartered savings banks and savings associations,
state-licensed housing creditors, certain HUD lenders, and others that
make mortgage loans would again be subject to state law rather than OTS
prepayment and late fee rules.
The AMTPA directs the OTS, OCC, and the National Credit Union Administration
(NCUA) to identify and publish regulations that are "inappropriate
for and inapplicable to" state housing creditors (Section 807(b)
of Pub. L. 97-320 (1982) as quoted by the OTS in 12 CFR 560.220). The
three agencies have approached the designation of rules differently.
The NCUA has identified all of its lending regulations as applicable
to alternative mortgages transactions made by state-chartered credit unions.
Significantly, the mortgage regulations in the Federal Credit Union Act
specifically prohibit prepayment penalties on any type of loan (12 USC
1757(5)(A)(viii)). This prohibition, however, applies to federal credit
unions rather than federally insured credit unions. Consequently, federally
insured state-chartered credit unions will be bound by this federal prohibition
only if they are making a mortgage loan in reliance of the AMTPA, i.e.,
making a so-called "parity act" mortgage or "alternative
mortgage transaction."
Any questions regarding this bulletin should be addressed to:
Office of Financial and Insurance Services
Policy Division
611 West Ottawa Street
P.O. Box 30220
Lansing, MI 48909-7720
Toll Free (877) 999-6442
|