| Issued and entered November 6, 2001 by Frank M. Fitzgerald, Commissioner
of Financial and Insurance Services
It has come to our attention that no-fault insurers
may be making statements to policyholders that are inconsistent with
coordination of care language in their no-fault policies. For example,
no-fault insurers have reportedly informed policyholders that, if
a service is not provided within their health maintenance organization
or preferred provider organization network, a referral from the network
physician is necessary, despite policy language that does not require
a referral.
Other automobile insurers have reportedly made unequivocal statements
to policyholders that if their health plan does not provide or pay
for a particular health service, their automobile policy is not responsible
for paying for it. Such a statement is incorrect, regardless of whether
the no-fault policy is being coordinated with a traditional health
insurance policy or a managed care plan such as an HMO or PPO.
Insurers are reminded that "misrepresenting pertinent facts
or insurance policy provisions relating to coverages at issue"
violates the Uniform Trade Practices Act, MCL 500.2026(a). Insurers
found to be in violation of this section are subject to the penalties
found in MCL 500.2038.
MCL 500.3107(1), in pertinent part, reads as follows:
Personal protection insurance benefits are payable for the following:
(a) Allowable expenses consisting of all reasonable charges incurred
for reasonably necessary products, services, and accommodations
for an injured person's care, recovery, or rehabilitation...
MCL 500.3109a, in pertinent part, reads as follows:
An insurer providing personal protection insurance benefits shall
offer, at appropriately reduced premium rates, deductibles and exclusions
reasonably related to other health and accident coverage on the
insured...
When policyholders choose to coordinate coverage, their health plan
becomes primary. However, their no-fault insurer remains liable for
all "reasonable charges incurred for reasonably necessary products,
services, and accommodations" for benefits not payable under
the primary plan. Whether a no-fault insurer is required to provide
benefits will usually depend on the nature of the medical condition,
the nature of the care available from the HMO/PPO, and the nature
of the care sought through the no-fault insurer and will be decided
on a case by case basis.
Questions regarding these issues should be directed to the attention
of:
Office of Financial and Insurance Services
Securities and Insurance Offerings Division
611 West Ottawa Street
P.O. Box 30220
Lansing, MI 48909-7720
Telephone: 517-373-0242
Toll Free: 877-999-6442
|