| Petitioner: |
Respondent: |
| XXXXXXXXXXXXX |
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Michigan |
Issued and entered December 19, 2002 by Frank M. Fitzgerald, Commissioner
ORDER
I
PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
On August 28, 2002, XXXXXXXXXX (Petitioner) filed a request for external
review with the Commissioner of Financial and Insurance Services (Commissioner)
under the Patient's Right to Independent Review Act (PRIRA), MCL 550.1901
et seq. After a review of the material submitted the Commissioner
accepted the request on September 5, 2002.
The issue involved in the adverse determination is contractual. The Commissioner
reviews contractual issues pursuant to MCL 550.1911(7). As a result, review
by an independent review organization is not required. The Commissioner
notified Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Michigan (BCBSM) of the request
for external review and requested the information it used in its adverse
determination. The Office of Financial and Insurance Services received
the BCBSM information on September 16, 2002.
II
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
From XXXXXXXXXX through XXXXXXXX, Petitioner received outpatient mental
health care from XXXXXXXXXXXXXX, a licensed social worker. The total charge
in question is $1,200.
BCBSM denied payment for the mental health care since it was not provided
by a physician, a fully licensed psychologist, or a staff member of a
participating outpatient mental health clinic. Petitioner claims her mental
health care is a covered benefit and BCBSM is required to pay for it.
III
ISSUE
Whether BCBSM properly denied coverage for mental health care provided
to Petitioner by a licensed social worker?
IV
ANALYSIS
Petitioner's Position
Petitioner began seeing XXXXXXXXX, a licensed social worker, after she
and her husband separated in XXXXXXXXXXXX. Petitioner's husband was terminated
from his job in XXXXXXXX which caused Petitioner to switch health insurers.
Petitioner's former health insurer paid for Petitioner's therapy from
XXXXXXX.
Petitioner's new heath care carrier, BCBSM, rejected Petitioner's claims
for XXXXXXX therapy on the basis that XXXXXXXX not a M.D., D.O or licensed
psychologist. Petitioner claims that this is irrelevant. Petitioner claims
that therapy provided by someone other than a M.D. or D.O. can be very
effective. She argues what is important is continuity of care. Petitioner
claims that switching to a new therapist would be a major disruption in
her care, since XXXXXXXX has been involved in petitioner's care from the
beginning.
Petitioner indicates that XXXXXX has informed her that she receives payment
from BCBSM for patients that have coverage through certain groups. Petitioner
therefore argues that BCBSM should pay for her care.
BCBSM's Position
Petitioner has health care coverage through XXXXXXXXXXXXX Company, an
industry rated group. The coverage is governed by the terms of the Community
Blue Group Benefits Certificate. Section 7 of the Certificate defines
terms used in the Certificate as follows:
Physician
Doctors of Medicine, Osteopathy, Podiatry, Chiropractic and Dentistry.
Psychologist
A practitioner of clinical psychology, counseling or guidance, who
is fully licensed and certified by the state of Michigan or by the state
where you receive services. Where there are no certification or licensure
requirements, the psychologist must be recognized by the appropriate
society.
The Certificate provision granting coverage is entitled, "Outpatient
Mental Health Care." It states:
We pay for the following outpatient mental health services when provided
by a physician or fully licensed psychologist in a physician's office
or in a participating outpatient mental health facility, unless otherwise
specified.
BCBSM states that XXXXXXX is not a physician or psychologist as defined
in the Certificate. BCBSM also states that XXXXX is an individual provider
and is not part of a participating outpatient facility. Therefore, BCBSM
claims that care provided by XXXXXXXXX is not a covered benefit and thus
BCBSM is not required to pay for it.
Commissioner's Review
The Certificate of coverage controls the analysis of this matter. The
Certificate indicates that outpatient mental health is payable only when
provided by a physician or fully licensed psychologist in a physician's
office or in a participating outpatient mental health facility. BCBSM
established that Petitioner's outpatient mental health care was provided
by a social worker. Therefore, the Commissioner concludes this care is
not a covered benefit and BCBSM is not required to pay for it. The fact
the Petitioner's former health care coverage paid for her care does not
alter the conclusion that this care is not a covered benefit under her
BCBSM Certificate.
Petitioner argued that BCBSM has paid for care provided by her therapist
for other patients who have coverage through other BCBSM groups. Some
BCBSM groups cover outpatient mental health care provided by limited licensed
physiologists and licensed social workers. Petitioner's coverage does
not include such a benefit.
V
ORDER
Therefore, the Commissioner ORDERS that the final adverse determination
by BCBSM dated August 20, 2002 is upheld. BCBSM is not required to pay
for the Petitioner's outpatient mental health care provided by XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX.
This is a final decision of an administrative agency. Under MCL 550.1915,
any person aggrieved by the Order may seek judicial review no later than
sixty days from the date of this Order in the Circuit Court for the country
where the covered person resides or in the Circuit County of Ingham County.
A copy of the petition for judicial review should be sent to the Commissioner
of the Office of the Office of Financial and Insurance Services, Health
Plans Division, Post Office Box 30220, Lansing MI 48909-7720.
|