STATE OF MICHIGAN
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS BUREAU
IN RE: REQUEST BY FINANCE AMERICA CORPORATION FOR A DECLARATORY
RULING ON THE INTERPRETATION OF SECTION 1(e) OF ACT 379 OF THE PUBLIC
ACTS OF 1984.
DECISION
Statement of Facts
Finance America Corporation (FAC), a licensee under 1981 PA 125,
1939 PA 21 and 1950 PA 27, is a corporation that offers consumer credit
in 42 of the 50 states. Mr. Richard C. Smith, the regional industry
relations director of FAC wrote a letter to Mr. John Drury dated January
22, 1985 pertaining to the interpretation of Section 1(e) of 1984
PA 379. This act authorizes the issuance of credit cards or other
devices which give the cardholder the privilege of obtaining credit.
Credit card issuers must obtain a license as required by the act and
shall not charge a rate of interest in excess of 1.5% of the unpaid
balance per month. Mr. Smith inquired into the possibility of requesting
an Attorney General Opinion on whether the word "device" used in the
definition of "credit card" in section 1(e) would include checks given
to a person (the debtor) as a part of a check credit program offered
by FAC. After being informed by Mr. Drury of the process required
to obtain an Attorney General Opinion, Mr. Smith, in a February 5
letter requested that the Bureau issue a declaratory ruling on the
question posed in the January 22 letter.
In the January 22 letter, Mr. Smith gave some details of FAC's PersonaLine
credit program (PLC). He indicated that FAC's PLC program was similar
in many respects to credit card revolving charge and loan accounts.
The PLC program provides the customer with access to a preapproved
line of credit on a continuing basis. The customer can access this
account to cover major long-term expenditures for medical services,
education, home improvements, appliances, etc. The customer is issued
a PLC identification card and PLC checks which enable the customer
to write checks for purchases or obtain cash advances from FAC branches.
Since the checks are drawn on the First National Bank of Allentown,
Pennsylvania, the PLC ID card is utilized to help ensure a high degree
of acceptability of PLC checks.
PLC customers are sent a statement each month stating the minimum
monthly payment, an account summary of checks written, cash advances
received, and payments made for the billing period. The finance charge
is computed on the average daily outstanding balance. PLC customers
may use any or all of the available credit at any time but incur finance
charges only on the outstanding balance. As the customer makes monthly
payments, his or her available credit is restored. The PLC program
is available in most of the 42 states in which FAC operates.
Issues
FAC seeks a ruling on the following:
- Do the checks and personal ID card issued in connection with the
PLC program as described herein constitute a "card" or "device"
as those terms are used in section 1(e) of 1984 PA 379.
- If the answer to question 1 is in the affirmative, could a licensee
under 1984 PA 379 offer a program similar to the PLC program.
Statutes
At issue in this request for a declaratory ruling is section 1(e)
of Act No. 379 of the Public Acts of 1984, an act which was signed
into law by Governor Blanchard on December 28, 1984. Section 1(e)
reads as follows:
""Credit card" or "charge card" means any card or device
issued by a licensee under a credit card arrangement which arrangement
gives to a cardholder the privilege of obtaining credit from the card
issuer or any other person in purchasing or leasing property or services,
obtaining credit or loans, or otherwise."
Discussion of Law
Section 1(e) of 1984 PA 379, in defining "credit card" or "charge
card", includes the following language: "...any card or device issued
by a licensee under a credit card arrangement..." (emphasis supplied).
The use of the term device in the language reflects a recognition
by the Legislature that licensees under the act might wish to provide
their customers with a means of accessing their lines of credit other
than the traditional access by card. The question that must be answered
therefore, is whether the PLC ID card and blank checks which are provided
to PLC customers constitute a "device" within the meaning of Section
1(e). The PLC program as described herein provides customers with
the same type of revolving credit services that is provided for credit
card holders. There is a preapproved revolving line of credit which
is available to each PLC customer. The customer at his or her option
can access this line of credit up to the stated limit to purchase
goods or services or to obtain cash advances.
The major difference between the PLC program and traditional credit
card programs, is the means by which customers access their line of
credit. In the case of a traditional credit card program the customer
presents his or her credit card at the place of purchase as a means
of paying for goods received or services rendered. The merchant uses
the credit card to produce a charge slip bearing the customer's signature.
The charge slip is presented to the card issuer as evidence of the
transaction whereupon the issuer advances credit to the customer by
paying for the obligation on behalf of the customer. With the PLC
program, the customer writes a PLC check which along with the PLC
ID card is presented to the merchant to pay for goods received or
services rendered. The merchant accepts the check and forwards the
check through the bank clearing network to the First National Bank
of Allentown. The check, in this case, performs a function that is
in substance identical to the charge slip in the case of a traditional
credit card program. The net result of the transaction in this case
is identical to the traditional credit card program. In both cases,
the customer can conveniently access his or her line of credit by
presenting a credit card or other device to a merchant or to a branch
office of the creditor in order to obtain a cash advance.
In a letter dated March 25, 1985, FAC informed the Bureau that in
their opinion their PLC program does not fall within the definition
of "credit card" found in Section 226.2(15) of Regulation Z (Truth
in Lending) 12 CFR 226 issued by the Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System. Section 226.2(15) reads as follows:
""Credit card" means any card, plate, coupon book, or other
single credit device that may be used from time to time to obtain
credit."
The Official Federal Reserve Board Staff Commentary to section 226.2(15)
indicates that the definition covers credit cards or devices which involve
the possibility of repeated use. The commentary indicates that checks
and similar instruments that can be used "only once to obtain a single
credit extension" are not credit cards as that term is used in section
226.2(15). FAC states that as a result of this exemption, their PLC
program which currently operates in several states need not comply with
provisions of Regulation Z which pertain to the mailing of unsolicited
credit cards, limitations of liability for unauthorized use, offsets,
discounts, and the crediting of refunds, etc.
The definition of credit card found in section 226.2(15) of Regulation
Z is narrower in scope than the definition contained in section 1(e)
of 1984 PA 379. The definition in PA 379 includes no requirement that
the credit card or other device be a single credit device. Therefore,
it is the Bureau's position that even though FAC's PLC program may
fall outside of the definition of credit cards contained in Regulation
Z, it clearly falls within the broader definition of credit card used
in section 1(e) of 1984 PA 379.
It must be recognized, however, that if FAC established its PLC
program under 1984 PA 379, all the requirements of that act must be
complied with including section 11. Section 11 of 1984 PA 379 reads,
in pertinent part, as follows:
"(1) A licensee shall make or give to the consumer the disclosures,
information, and notices required by the truth in lending act for
a credit card arrangement that is governed by this act.
"(2) To the extent that the truth in lending act does not
impose duties or obligations upon a person for an account established
for personal, household, or family purposes in a credit card arrangement
that is governed by this act, the person shall make or give to the
consumer disclosures, information, and notices in accordance with
the federal truth in lending act with respect to the credit transaction."
Our interpretation of Section 11 is that it would require FAC, in instituting
its PLC program in Michigan under PA 379, to comply with all the credit
card provisions of Regulation Z which pertain to consumer disclosures,
information and notices even though the program may not be included
in the definition of "credit card" contained in section 226.2(15) of
Regulation Z.
Conclusion
For the reasons set forth above it is the position of this Bureau
that a personal ID card along with blank checks issued to a customer
in connection with FAC's PLC program described herein, would be within
the meaning of the term "device" as used in defining "credit card"
or "charge card" in section 1(e) of 1984 PA 379. A licensee under
1984 PA 379 could institute a program similar to FAC's PLC program
provided it complies with all provisions of the act including section
11.
Eugene W. Kuthy, Commissioner
Financial Institutions Bureau, Department of Commerce
April 10, 1985
|