Analysis
Topic: Emergency Medical Services
Sponsor: Bennett
Position: The Department of Consumer and Industry Services supports the bill.
Background: There have reportedly been situations in Michigan where properly trained emergency medical service personnel have not been able to use advanced life support skills and
equipment because the ambulance operation was not licensed at that level. These situations pose
a threat to the lives of those needing advanced life support who are unable to receive it on the
scene of an accident, natural disaster or other emergency because the ambulance at the scene did
not happen to be licensed at that level.
Description of the Bill: The bill amends the Public Health Code to permit certain
ambulance operations to apply for an ambulance operation upgrade license. Such a license
would allow an ambulance to operate at the limited advanced life support or advanced life
support level if properly trained emergency medical staff are available on a shift. The upgrade
license is for a period of two years and may be renewed for one additional period of two years.
An applicant for an upgrade license is required to provide a plan for permanently upgrading its
service from the basic life support level to the higher level. Recommendations from the
appropriate medical control authority and the Statewide Emergency Medical Services
Coordinating Committee would be required before the department issues the license. The
department is required to file a written report with the Legislature within three years after the
effective date of the bill.
Arguments:
Pro: By permitting highly trained emergency medical service personnel to use
their skills in emergency situations the bill will save lives.
The bill will make it easier for local ambulance services to attract and retain highly trained
personnel by providing a mechanism by which their skills can be used to the fullest extent.
The limit of one two-year renewal assures that an increased level of care can be provided in
communities wishing to do so without damaging the current three-tier licensure system for
ambulance operations. The limit will provide a significant incentive for communities seeking to
upgrade their service level to actually do so.
Con: The bill will reduce the incentive to upgrade ambulance services from basic life support to limited advanced life support or advanced life support by providing an easy to obtain
intermediate step. Although the legislation provides for only one two-year renewal, a subsequent
Legislature may be asked by the proponents of this legislation to provide for additional renewals.
Supporters/Opponents: Although they had reservations about the one renewal limit, emergency medical service personnel from Flat Rock and Woodhaven supported the bill in
Senate and House committee. The American Red Cross and the Michigan Association of
Ambulance Services testified in support of the substitute. Right to Life testified against the
substitute in committee because of the one renewal limit. The Tri-County Medical Control
Authority supported more flexible licensing, but didn't like the limit on renewals, either.
Fiscal Information: The bill creates a new licensure category for ambulance operators. Those applying for the upgrade license would still be required to obtain an operating license at
the basic life support level. The fee for the upgrade license is $100 and is valid for a period of
two years. The upgrade license may be renewed for a period of two years. It is not possible to
estimate the number of applications which are likely to be received for the new license.
The Department of Consumer and Industry Services would be required to compile and submit a
report on the experience of ambulance operators who seek to upgrade their level of service
during the three years after the bill's effective date. The department would also be required to
address the impact of the bill on the delivery of emergency medical services in the state in that
report.
Administrative Rules Impact: There is no new authority in the bill to promulgate
administrative rules. New rules should not be necessary.