APPROVED
MICHIGAN COMMISSION FOR THE BLIND
APRIL 24, 2006
COMMISSION FOR THE BLIND TRAINING CENTER
KALAMAZOO, MICHIGAN
MINUTES
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT
Ms. Jo Ann Pilarski, Chair (via Telephone conference)
Mr. J. J. Jackson, Vice Chair Ms. Sheila Ashcraft
Mr. Richard Grant Ms. Geri Taeckens
COMMISSIONERS ABSENT
None
COMMISSION FOR THE BLIND (MCB) STAFF PRESENT
Mr. Patrick Cannon Ms. Tish Kingaby
Ms. Melody Lindsey Mr. Leamon Jones
Mr. Fred Wurtzel Ms. Susan Turney
Ms. Sherry Gordon Mr. Roger Yake
Ms. Lisa Kisiel Ms. Shannon McVoy
Ms. Mary Zemlich Ms. Corda Moss
GUESTS/ATTENDEES
Mr. John Victory Ms. Elizabeth Lennon
Ms. Connie Ennis Ms. Jane Schoneman
Ms. Patricia Tassie Mr. J.J. Madough
Ms. Terri DeJong Mr. Thomas Kent
Mr. Kirk Mensinger Mr. Bill Park
Ms. Marylee Alzner Mr. Bob Gaylor
Mr. George Wurtzel Ms. Melissa Jones
Ms. Ann Harris Ms. Joyce Dallenbach
Mr. Dave Stults
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
The Committee of the Whole was opened by Vice Chair J. J. Jackson at 9:05 a.m. The meeting was audiostreamed.
COMMISSIONER ACTIVITIES
Ms. Sheila Ashcraft reported attendance at the Pontiac Visually Impaired Persons support group monthly meetings. Many members of this group are previous Commission clients who had attended the training center and asked Ms. Ashcraft to express their best wishes and appreciation.
Ms. Ashcraft also attended the Services Delivery Focus Design Team meeting, at which Mr. Song Jae Jo, a doctoral student, talked about his survey on clients who had completed the Michigan Commission for the Blind (MCB) program, and especially the success in employment for those clients who had previous job experience.
Mr. Richard Grant was welcomed by Mr. Jackson, who expressed sorrow felt by everyone at the Commission at the passing of Mr. Grant’s wife, Doris, in March. Mr. Grant said he felt the support he had received was equivalent to the beneficial effects of his own attendance at the Training Center several years earlier, and that he very much appreciated everyone’s kindness and support.
Ms. Geri Taeckens said she was gradually assimilating the programs, history and philosophy of the Commission’s programs and people, as she grew in her role as a new commissioner. Ms. Taeckens said she would be attending the next Image and Identity Team meeting, scheduled for May 16.
Ms. Taeckens also gave a report on the Ad Hoc Committee on Training Center Services (see below). In addition, she thanked Ms. Melody Lindsey, Director of the Training Center (MCBTC), for spending time with her the day before to show her the center, and for the opportunity to get to know Ms. Lindsey.
Ms. Jo Ann Pilarski reported attendance at the Business Enterprise Program (BEP) Workshop, about which Mr. Fred Wurtzel was scheduled to give a report later in the meeting. She felt the workshop topic of catering was very motivational and well received.
Mr. Jackson also attended the BEP workshop, and commended the speaker from Cysco Foods. He also noted that the Elected Operators Committee elected a new chair, Mr. Thomas Kent. Mr. Jackson also attended the Cultural Diversity Committee meeting in March, the focus of which was a proposal to present at the National Association of Multicultural Rehabilitation Concerns (NAMRC) conference in July. Mr. Jackson said that the proposal was received too late by the presentation committee and it appeared it was not accepted. However, it is expected the proposal would be submitted for the Michigan Rehabilitation Conference scheduled in November. Mr. Jackson said two new members joined the Cultural Diversity Team, Ms. Janine Frank and Ms. Stephanie Lwanga of the MCB staff.
Ad Hoc Committee On Training Center Services
Ms. Taeckens reported attendance at the first meeting, held March 31, of the MCB Ad Hoc Committee on Training Center Services, to review programs and services and recommend improvements. She said she had initially experienced some doubts about the size and content of the team, and its goals and agendas. She praised Mr. John Victory who facilitated the meeting for his demonstration of the concept of positive communication. Ms. Taeckens said the group was extremely motivated, very positive, and she sensed no hidden agendas. She has a lot of faith that this group would develop good ideas for the training center. Ms. Taeckens said she was impressed with what the Training Center is already doing, much of which she did not know about.
2006 DIRECTOR’S OBJECTIVES STATUS REPORT
Mr. Patrick Cannon, Director, said that in almost all of the fourteen objectives set for 2006, the timelines were on track, with details summarized in the written report submitted to the Board. The Ad Hoc Committee on Training Center Services was established and got off to a good start at their March 31 meeting.
PREVIOUS ISSUES
Ms. Tish Kingaby reported that the One Stop Inclusion Workgroup Summary Report on accessibility of the Michigan Works! Centers was still not ready for distribution. It is anticipated to be ready in May and will be forwarded at that time.
Ms. Taeckens asked about the status of the compilation of events and activities suggested in the February meeting. Ms. Kingaby reported the text from the February consumer dialogue session was sent out to Casey Dutmer of the Consumer Involvement Council (CIC), and Lisa Kisiel, MCB’s liaison to the CIC, and copies of the meeting tapes were sent to Ms. Pilarski and Ms. Taeckens. Mr. Cannon said Mr. Dutmer and Ms. Kisiel would be compiling the list of potential activities for youth. As one of the director’s fourteen objectives, it is anticipated a comprehensive list of transition activities for youth would be in place by the fall. Ms. Pilarski hoped that one central location could be established that parents could access for this informtion. Mr. Cannon said that the next CIC meeting is May 22. Mr. Jackson said, as the CIC meeting would be his last official meeting as a commissioner, he would leave a written report to be read at the June meeting.
Ms. Taeckens asked about the proposed Board retreat. Ms. Pilarski said she felt it should be postponed until such time as the new commissioner would be appointed. Mr. Cannon said he had received no indication from the Governor’s office that they are ready to make an appointment. Ms. Taeckens suggested that work on the agenda content could be undertaken in the summer months, and volunteered to help as she was available during this period.
REGULAR MEETING
CALL TO ORDER, ROLL CALL AND DETERMINATION OF QUORUM
The regular meeting was called to order at 10:02 a.m. Roll call was taken and a quorum was present. Mr. Jackson particularly welcomed Ms. Elizabeth Lennon, former commissioner to the first Board of the MCB, to the meeting.
MS. ASHCRAFT MOVED, SUPPORTED BY MS. TAECKENS, TO ACCEPT THE MINUTES OF THE FEBRUARY 24, 2006 MEETING, AS PRESENTED. THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
PUBLIC COMMENT
Ms. Connie Ennis, former MCBTC student and current member of the Consumer Involvement Council, said she found her time at the training center, November 2005 through April 2006, was a wonderful experience, very productive for her and she praised the excellent staff.
Ms. Patricia Tassie said she also attended the Center in March 2004, and that it was an excellent experience which taught her how to function independently. She started classes as a student at Western Michigan University the following August. Ms. Tassie said she had only good things to say about her experience.
Ms. Elizabeth Lennon, former commissioner, said she was glad the Board traveled to Kalamazoo each year to give consumers in the area the opportunity to interact with the Board.
BOARD CORRESPONDENCE
There was no Board correspondence.
CONSUMER DIALOGUE
Mr. John Victory, the Victory Group, facilitator for the consumer dialogue segment, explained that this portion of the commission meeting was initiated to allow a period of time in which consumers could have direct interaction with members of the Board on various issues of blindness. Mr. Victory reviewed concepts outlined in two documents distributed to the attendees, Dialogue Guidelines for Agile Thinking and “The Five Ds” of Appreciative Inquiry: Dialogue, Discover, Dream, Design and Deliver. The Board discussed the importance of establishing common ground among groups to help bring them together, and also the need to identify the “elephant” in the room, i.e. the big issue that no one wants to raise.
As no issues were raised by the attendees, Ms. Taeckens asked if anyone would like to make suggestions for changes or improvements to the training center, as an aid to the ad hoc committee. One suggestion included looking into ways to expand resources for staff or consultants for assistive technology instruction. Ms. Ashcraft suggested that if the audiostreaming of the meeting becomes interactive, a discussion might be scheduled with a commission from another state which has successfully added staff for this purpose. Discussion was held regarding the differences between Michigan and Texas which has four full time staff for assistive technology instruction, including the fact that MCB was created to serve consumers who were either legally blind or where blindness was imminent, whereas many other states also serve those who are visually impaired which leads to much greater success rates for employment of the numbers of clients served. Additionally, Texas receives a split of 20 percent of federal rehabilitation dollars allocated versus Michigan’s current allocation of 12.75 percent, which will be increased to 15 percent by 2008.
MCB DIRECTOR'S REPORT
Mr. Cannon referred the Board to the written MCB Report and information previously submitted to the Board and posted on the MCB website. Mr. Cannon said that if the Board had any questions regarding the work of the Technology Committee, Mr. Roger Yake was available to answer questions. Mr. Cannon noted that as a result of the Vision 2020 initiative begun in 1999, the Technology Committee was created as one of four focus design teams and exists because technology and ways to provide greater technology services is such an important component of MCB’s philosophy. Mr. Cannon also mentioned that following the proposal by the Technology Committee for an expanded technology center, a request for capital outlay dollars had repeatedly been made and denied. However, a current request for federal earmark funding for this purpose had cleared the offices of Department of Labor and Economic Growth and the Governor, and Mr. Cannon said it is hoped this will be supported by the U.S. Senate. Mr. Cannon reported that while in Washington, D.C. Ms. Lindsey was scheduled to meet April 25 with Senator Debbie Stabenow to discuss the proposed technology center expansion. Mr. Cannon said that, following the conclusion of the meeting, he and Ms. Lindsey were departing for Washington to attend conferences of the Council of State Administrators of Vocational Rehabilitation (CSAVR) and the National Council of State Agencies for the Blind (NCSAB). Ms. Lindsey will be on a panel reporting on the mini adjustment programs, which originated in Michigan and have been emulated in other states.
Mr. Cannon said that prior to highlighting his written report, he wished to present a certificate of recognition to Mr. Fred Wurtzel for his twenty years of service to the Michigan Commission for the blind and the citizens of Michigan. The Board congratulated Mr. Wurtzel.
Mr. Cannon summarized several portions of his written report. Topics included the implementation of accessible electronic and information technology through the Michigan Department of Information Technology; outreach activities to the eye care community, mainly through the efforts of Susan Turney, MCB Communications and Outreach Coordinator, as well as Mr. Cannon’s scheduled presentation at the August conference of the Michigan Society of Eye Physicians and Surgeons (previously called the Michigan Ophthalmological Society); summer programs for youth around Michigan, including the opportunity for youth to gain work experience which is a valuable asset on a resume; and a report that there is no change to current language regarding service animals on planes.
Mr. Cannon also outlined the upcoming Visions 2006 vendor fair, co-sponsored by MCB and the Washtenaw County Library for the Blind and Physically Disabled, which will be held May 10 in Ann Arbor. This event, held biennially, is the fourth vendor fair demonstrating technology and services for the blind and visually impaired.
Topics at the CSAVR and NCSAB conferences will include the realignment of the Rehabilitation Services Administration (RSA), which closed its regional offices last year, and the resulting effect on services, including technical assistance and monitoring; reauthorization of the Rehab Act which is still held up in Congress; and the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pension’s oversight hearings held last fall on the Randolph-Sheppard Act, which is the authority for the Business Enterprise Program, its overall effectiveness, and whether it should be expanded to include all people with disabilities. The Board discussed and it was reaffirmed that it is the Commission’s desire that this program remain exclusively for the blind.
Mr. Cannon said that at the CSAVR Region V meeting held in Chicago, March 28-29, a topic was raised at his suggestion following discussion at a commission meeting, on providing rehabilitation services to youth. Mr. Cannon discovered that Michigan is the only state in the six state region that provides any services to youth under age 14 and one state provides no services until youth reach age 16.
Mr. Cannon reported 41 attendees at the mini adjustment program in Detroit. He also noted that the popular mini adjustment program is scheduled again this spring and summer in Clare and Lansing.
Commissioners commended Mr. Cannon on the MCB report, its detail, and the high level of activity by staff.
Mr. Cannon concluded by announcing that it was hoped to post a technology training specialist position at the Training Center very soon, and that one of the job duties included a help desk toll free number to assist clients around the state. Mr. Yake reported that two additional recommendations by the Technology Committee were being implemented: one, that student access to the internet and email at the center would soon be expanded as wireless networks were being installed, and second, that multi-functional equipment was being installed in MCB offices for printing, copying and fax purposes which included voice commands on copying functions by blind staff. Mr. Yake said access will be improved when manufacturers are taught how to design the machines with the access built in, rather than added on, as the fax functions still were not usable by blind staff.
MR. GRANT MOVED, SUPPORTED BY MS. TAECKENS, TO ACCEPT THE DIRECTOR’S REPORT, AS PRESENTED. THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
MCB CONSUMER SERVICES REPORT
Mr. Leamon Jones, Director of the Consumer Services Division, highlighted sections from the written MCB report, including the work of the Services Delivery Focus Design Team task force to study college assessment and technology needs, work experience needs of prospective students, and several conferences attended by staff.
Mr. Jones outlined some significant topics from workshops, including the Josephine L. Taylor Leadership Conference in Atlanta which highlighted a pilot project allowing provision of vision rehabilitation services by occupational therapists, under the direction of a physician. Mr. Jones also emphasized attendance by staff at the Transition Conference in Frankenmuth, as transition was an extremely important component for staff to understand in order to help prepare youth for college or employment.
At the Fifteenth Annual Older Blind Conference, Mr. Jones said he learned new measurements and monitoring systems will be put in place in 2008. Core competencies will be developed so that individuals receive the same basic services, with written goals and objectives. At the March CSAVR meeting, standards and indicators for the new monitoring system administered by the RSA were also discussed.
Mr. Jones described activities in both regions including cash match agreements and summer programs being developed around the state, especially those involving transition activities which they hope in some cases to extend to year-round services.
Mr. Grant commended the staff’s efforts to provide opportunities for youth in gaining various skills which in turn improves their self image. Ms. Taeckens also asked about public service announcements, and Ms. Turney related that MCB recently had some good exposure as a co-sponsor of the Michigan Works Expo held in Lansing, but that in general, there was no longer any free public service announcements in television.
MS. ASHCRAFT MOVED, SUPPORTED BY MR. GRANT, TO ACCEPT THE CONSUMER SERVICES DIVISION REPORT, AS PRESENTED. THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
ELECTED OPERATORS COMMITTEE REPORT
Mr. Fred Wurtzel, Manager of the Business Enterprise Program, introduced the newly elected chair of the Elected Operators Committee (EOC), Mr. Thomas Kent. Several motions were passed by the EOC in February 2006 which were sent in a written report to the Board, with two motions requiring approval by the Board. The two motions, staff comments and recommendations were read aloud, and discussion was held on the motions.
MS. TAECKENS MOVED, SUPPORTED BY MR. GRANT, TO ACCEPT THE ELECTED OPERATORS COMMITTEE MOTION THAT IN FUTURE WHEN NON-MANDATED FACILITIES ARE INCLUDED IN A LOCATION AND THE LOCATION GOES UP FOR BID, THE NON-MANDATED FACILITY STAYS AND DOES NOT MOVE THE WITH THE OPERATOR. THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Recessed for lunch at 12:25 p.m.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
The meeting was reconvened at 1:15 p.m.
ELECTED OPERATORS COMMITTEE REPORT (Continued)
MR. GRANT MOVED, SUPPORTED BY MS. TAECKENS, TO ACCEPT THE ELECTED OPERATORS COMMITTEE MOTION THAT ANY PERSON WHO HAS LEFT THE
PROGRAM HAS THREE YEARS TO RETURN TO THE PROGRAM WITHOUT HAVING TO COMPLETE THE ENTIRE VENDING STAND TRAINING PROCESS. THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Mr. Kent gave a brief summary of his experience as an operator and the immediate goals of the EOC to work closely with the Consumers Services Division and the vocational rehabilitation staff to attract and train new operators, and also to work on the inventory process. Discussion was held regarding the current inventory system which is based on two weeks’ inventory, a dollar amount, which must be in place when an operator takes over a new facility. This amount is based on purchases for a year divided by 26, and while this may be a correct dollar amount, the system often results in an unbalance in product. Mr. Wurtzel said BEP staff and the EOC hoped to bring in experts to help them develop alternate ways to set inventory.
Mr. Kent thanked the members of the EOC who had previously served on the committee and congratulated the newly elected members. Mr. Kent invited the Board to visit a variety of facilities to see how they work and offer any suggestions for improvement.
BUSINESS ENTERPRISEPROGRAM REPORT
Mr. Fred Wurtzel, BEP Manager, reported that while EOC motions were made and passed at the BEP Workshop, April 7-9, these were not ready for presentation to the Board as the BEP secretary had recently taken another position. It is hoped the motions can be presented at the June Board meeting.
Mr. Wurtzel said he appreciated his 20 year certificate of recognition, and that he had enjoyed his experience working in the Business Enterprise Program, in which he began as an operator.
Mr. Wurtzel said the BEP workshop had focused almost entirely on catering, as a follow up to the new rules promulgated last fall which included catering as part of the mandated services in state properties. Mr. Wurtzel said several operators reported significant increase in sales. While the process is not running smoothly yet, Mr. Wurtzel said that much of this was due to the need for training in catering. Mr. Wurtzel said his supervisor, Ms. Sherri Heibeck, Administrative Services Manager, has been extremely supportive and although she previously had no background in the BEP, she assimilates the challenges and develops solutions in a speedy and efficient manner.
Mr. Wurtzel said he looked forward to working with the new EOC which seemed open to change and challenges and committed to improving the BEP system. It is hoped that training in leadership, appreciative inquiry dialogue, and other topics can be provided to aid the EOC. Mr. Wurtzel thanked the Board for its support.
MS. TAECKENS MOVED, SUPPORTED BY MR. GRANT, TO ACCEPT THE BUSINESS ENTERPRISE PROGRAM REPORT, AS PRESENTED. THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
MCB TRAINING CENTER REPORT
Ms. Melody Lindsey, Director of the MCB Training Center, reported that their maintenance supervisor, Dick Linihan, was retiring at the end of the week, and it was hoped to fill his position quickly. It is also anticipated that approval to post both a technology trainer position and a secretary position is imminent.
Ms. Lindsey reported that the Memorandum of Understanding with the Department of Education and Opportunities Unlimited for the Blind (OUB) for programs at Camp Tuhsmeheta had been developed, as well as MCB’s Quest for Success program which hopes to attract 12-30 students this summer with many MCB staff participating.
Ms. Lindsey said that actor Jeff Daniels had visited the Center on March 8 in order to study for an upcoming role as a blind person in the movie, “The Lookout.” Mr. Daniels kept his visit very low key and he met with staff and with students who presented him with a CD in which they described how they did everyday tasks as blind people; they also wanted him to know the true implications of blindness rather than the stereotypes of blindness. Mr. Daniels was interested in Braille and in learning to use the cane effectively. Ms. Lindsey said it was a great experience.
MCB TRAINING CENTER POLICIES
As a continuation of the work started at the February 24 meeting, the Board completed its review of the proposed new policies for the Training Center.
Ms. Kingaby read a summary from the minutes of the previous progress to refresh the Board, which included the approval of policies #2, #3, #4, #5, #6. Policies #1, 7 and 8 were deferred with discussion on #9 suspended.
The Board approved the following policies, with amendments, as follows:
9. Students are required to participate in all scheduled classes. Three unexcused absences or excessive tardiness in a one month period shall result in program termination for the student.
10. It is the responsibility of the consumer, parent or legal guardian, rehabilitation counselor, and other designated staff to discuss and record in writing all special guidelines, procedures and instructions for any student as necessary to maintain health, safety, or special programmatic issues, that would impact participation in the center program for that student or other student(s) or staff. Individualized guidelines, procedures and instructions may be written for any student with special programming needs.
Additional Policies for Students who have a Legal Guardian
Please note that the policies listed below pertain only to minor students or to other students who have a legal guardian:
11. Students shall remain on Training Center grounds unless they have written permission of their legal guardian.
12. No sexual contact is permitted.
15. Only adult students will be assigned to second floor dormitory rooms. Students who are minors or who have a legal guardian are not permitted on the second floor.
After a short discussion, approval was also given to Policy No.1:
1. MCBTC shall maintain a learning environment that is free from harassment. No student or staff shall be subjected to harassment by another student or employee.
During discussion of the various policies, the board felt it was important that “sexual contact” be better defined to avoid misunderstanding. Ms. Pilarski said any commissioner could write an opinion on policies they took exception to. Mr. Grant commented that while policies had been adopted by the board as a whole, he wished to state his disagreement on some of the moral issues contained in the policies. He believed certain of these policies could very well lead to establishment of predator/prey relationships. Mr. Grant also stated that he disagreed with the supposition that there need not be any concerns over the legal implications of the policies based on the verbal review by the Office of the Attorney General (AG). Mr. Grant strongly recommended the board should take appropriate steps to provide an adequate written review of these policies by the AG’s office.
Mr. Cannon said that deferred proposed policies, #7, #8, #13, and #14 will revert to guidelines, and may be referred back to the original committee on training center policies at some point in the future, or to a new committee formed for future deliberation on additional policies. Review of such policies would follow process through the Planning and Quality (PAQ) Team and Consumer Involvement Council (CIC) before presentation to the Board.
Discussion was held about the preamble regarding the need to add “visually impaired” each time a reference to “blind” is made. It was felt that further references are inferred and the language could stand as written. Ms. Pilarski said this issue was an “elephant” which should be discussed, perhaps at a Committee of the Whole or at a PAQ meeting.
MR. JACKSON MOVED, SUPPORTED BY MS. ASHCRAFT, TO FORMALLY ADOPT POLICIES #1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 12 AND 15, AS AMENDED, AND THAT PROPOSED #7, 8, 13 AND 14 WILL REVERT TO GUIDELINES. THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Mr. Cannon thanked the Board for their long and careful consideration of these policies, and Ms. Pilarski said she was very appreciative of the hard work performed by the various committees in preparing the proposed policies.
COMMISSIONER JACKSON RECOGNITION
Ms. Pilarski commended Mr. Jackson for his four years service on the Board and on the Cultural Diversity Committee. Each of the Board gave personal comments. Mr. Cannon, on behalf of the Board and the staff of the Michigan Commission for the Blind, thanked Mr. Jackson for his service and presented a plaque to Mr. Jackson. Mr. Jackson said he was very regretful that he had to leave, congratulated the Board on its growth, and especially Chair Pilarski’s leadership, and indicated he would be forwarding a personal farewell letter by email.
PUBLIC COMMENT
Mr. George Wurtzel, Opportunities Unlimited for the Blind (OUB), introduced the organization’s new secretary, Ms. Melissa Jones. He requested the Board’s support that proceeds from the sale of the former Michigan Commission for the Blind property be deposited to the Michigan School for the Blind Trust Fund. Mr. Wurtzel also described the satisfactory conclusion of the Memorandum of Understanding between MCB, OUB and Department of Education, and various programs being planned for youth at Camp Tuhsmeheta.
MR. JACKSON MOVED, SUPPORTED BY MR. GRANT,
THAT THE BOARD WRITE A LETTER TO THE GOVERNOR RECOMMENDING HER SUPPORT THAT THE PROCEEDS FROM THE SALE OF THE FORMER MICHIGAN SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND PROPERTY BE DEPOSITED IN THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION’S MICHIGAN SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND TRUST FUND. THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Ms. Joyce Dallenbach, MCB client, said she had concerns regarding the policy discussion for minors, as she feels it is important not to have too much oversight at the Training Center, that minors are often too over-protected, that while she understands the challenge for the staff to oversee clients, attending the Training Center is often a turning point for students and they should be accorded trust, dignity and respect.
ADJOURNMENT
MS. PILARSKI MOVED, SUPPORTED BY MS. TAECKENS, TO ADJOURN THE MEETING. THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
The meeting was adjourned at 3:45 p.m. The next meeting will be held on Friday, June 23, 2006 at the Victor Building, Third Floor Conference Rooms A/B, in Lansing. The meeting will begin at 9:00 a.m.
Jo Ann Pilarski, Chairperson
Date