| Petitioner: |
Respondent: |
| XXXXXXXXXXXXX |
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Michigan |
Issued and entered December 19, 2002 by Frank M. Fitzgerald, Commissioner
ORDER
I
PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
On June 7, 2002 the Petitioner, XXXXXXXX, filed a request for external
review with the Commissioner of Financial and Insurance Services (Commissioner)
under the Patient’s Right to Independent Review Act, MCL 550.1901 to MCL
550.1929. After a review of the material submitted, the Commissioner accepted
the request. The issue involved is medical in nature. The Commissioner
therefore assigned it to an independent review organization (IRO) on June
14, 2002. On June 27, 2002, the IRO provided its recommendation to the
Commissioner.
II
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
In 2001, the Petitioner underwent amputation of his right
leg at XXXXXXXXXXXX. He also had severe ulcerations of his left lower
leg. From XXXXXXXXXX, he was transferred to the XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
on August 9, 2001 where he stayed until November 11, 2001. XXXXXXX billed
him for his room and board, drugs, and therapy services that Medicare
paid as the primary insurance leaving a balance of $7,821.00.
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Michigan (BCBSM) denied coverage
for the balance of his care at XXXXXX. The Petitioner believes that BCBSM
is required to for the balance of his care at XXXXXXXXX.
III
ISSUE
Is BCBSM required to pay the $7,821.00 balance for the care
the Petitioner received at XXXXXXXXX?
IV
ANALYSIS
Petitioner’s Argument
After the Petitioner was admitted to XXXXXX on August 9, 2001 he was
advised by a social worker there that his care would be covered up to
100 days by Medicare and BCBSM. BCBSM denied payment for the co-payment
charges not paid by Medicare because convalescent care is not a covered
benefit under the Certificate. The Petitioner argues that he did not receive
convalescent care but open wound care and rehabilitation with physical
therapy. This care was necessary because his leg was amputated above the
knee.
The Petitioner provided information from his doctors indicating the
type of care he received at XXXXXXXX. The Petitioner is 83 years old and
on a limited budget. He believes that since Medicare paid its part of
his care at XXXXXX BCBSM is required to pay for the balance.
BCBSM’s Argument
BCBSM argues that XXXXXXXwhere the Petitioner received care is not a
hospital. It appears that the Petitioner received some skilled care at
this facility but it is not listed as a Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF)
with BCBSM. BCBSM also indicates that even if XXXXXX was a SNF the Petitioner’s
certificate does not cover services at such a facility.
BCBSM states that any statement made by a social worker at XXXXXXX cannot
bind BCBSM since that individual is not an employee or agent of BCBSM.
BCBSM argues it acted properly in this case when it denied payment for
the Petitioner’s care at XXXXXXXX since this facility is not a hospital
and its services are not a covered benefit under the Certificate.
IRO Recommendation
The IRO recommended and concluded:
- The treatment the Petitioner received at XXXXX from August 9, 2001
until November 11, 2001 was medically necessary for treatment of his
condition.
- XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX does not meet the definition of a hospital
set forth in the BCBSM Certificate.
Commissioner’s Review
The certificate of coverage controls the analysis of whether BCBSM is
required to pay the balance of the care the Petitioner received at XXXXXXXXX.
The Petitioner is enrolled through the XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, an area rated
group. The Comprehensive Hospital Care Group Benefit Certificate governs
the coverage. His coverage is supplemental to Medicare. It provides coverage
for services not covered by Medicare up to the coverage limits enjoyed
by members of his group who are not yet eligible for Medicare. The specific
terms of coverage that apply to this dispute are as follows:
SECTION 2: The Language of Health Care
This section explains the terms used in your Certificate
Hospital
A facility which provides inpatient diagnosis and therapeutic services
24 hours every day. Patients served are injured or acutely ill. The
facility provides a professional staff of licensed physicians and nurses
to supervise the care of the patients.
Payable inpatient services
- Semi-private room
- Nursing services
- Meals, including special diets…
- Physical therapy treatments, including occupational and speech used
for rehabilitation…
- BCBSM-approved drugs, biologicals and solutions used during your
stay in the hospital.
Nursing home care is not a covered benefit under the Petitioner’s BCBSM
Certificate. Hospital care is a covered benefit. XXXXXX is a nursing home
and does not meet the definition of a hospital as set forth in the Certificate.
Therefore, BCBSM is not required to pay for any of the care provided to
the Petitioner at XXXXXXXXX.
V
ORDER
The April 8, 2002 final adverse determination of BCBSM is upheld. BCBSM
is not required to pay for the balance of the Petitioner’s care at XXXXXXXXX.
This is a final decision of an administrative agency. Under MCL 550.1915,
MCL 600.631, MCR 7.101 and MCR 7.104, any person aggrieved by this order
may seek judicial review no later than sixty days from the date of this
order in the circuit court for the county where the covered person resides
or in the Circuit Court of Ingham County. A copy of the petition for
judicial review should be sent to the Commissioner of the Office of
Financial and Insurance Services, Health Plans Division, Post Office
Box 30220, Lansing, MI 48909-7720.
|