Analysis
TOPIC: Criminal Checks on Child Care Workers
Sponsor: Bouchard
Committee: Health and Human Services
Position: The Department of Consumer and Industry Services supports the concept of the
bill.
Background: There has been a growing sensitivity at both the state and federal level concerning
the potential for child abuse occuring outside the home by persons already convicted of child
abuse or other serious crimes. This abuse could occur at school, in day care centers, at camp and
can be prevented by taking advantage of the extensive law enforcement data bases which already
exist. The Federal Bureau of Investigations maintains a national data base of criminal history
records submitted by state, local and federal agencies. This data base includes fingerprint
records, personal identification data and reports of arrests and convictions. The Michigan State
Police maintains a similar data base containing Michigan records.
The Michigan Legislature has already passed legislation protecting children from potential child
abusers at school , but no legislation exists to protect children in a day care or camp setting.
Public Act 61 of 1987 required county prosecuting attorneys to notify the State Board of
Education when a teacher had been convicted of a sex-related offense or child abuse.
Public Act 99 of 1992 amended the School Code to require local school boards to obtain
a criminal history check from the State Police before making an offer of initial
employment to a teacher or administrator. This act also applies to nonpublic schools.
Public Act 144 of 1994 expanded the list of offenses included in the list and Public Act
83 of 1995 included all felonies and certain administrators. The latter bill also required
an FBI check on applicants, as well as the previously required state records check.
At least thirty-one states and the District of Columbia have enacted laws that require criminal
history screening through the FBI.
The federal government has also been active in this area. The National Child Protection Act of
1993 was enacted to encourage states with criminal history screening laws to expand their scope,
to encourage the remaining states to adopt such laws and to improve the quality of the criminal
history records used for the checks.
Bill Content
The bill would prohibit the department from issuing or renewing a license or certificate of
registration without requesting criminal history and criminal records checks for the person
seeking the license or renewal or for each partner, officer or manager of the child care
organization. If any facility of the child care organization is a private residence, criminal history
and criminal records checks would also be required for each individual who is over 16 years of
age. The requests would be submitted through the Department of State Police. The individual
would be required to give written consent at the time of the application for the required checks.
The individual would be required to submit his or her fingerprints to the Department of State
Police for purposes of the checks.
The criminal history check must be completed and reported by the Department of State Police to
the department within 45 days. The Department of State Police must initiate a criminal records
check within 7 days of receiving the request and provide the results to the department.
If the criminal history and criminal records checks of an applicant or a partner, officer, or
manager of a child care organization reveal a criminal conviction, the bill gives discretion to the
department if the conviction is not a listed conviction or if the application is a renewal. When
the department renews such a license, the child care organization is required to notify the parent
or guardian of each child the individual's listed conviction. Where the application is for an
original license, the department is required to deny the application if there is a conviction.
Section 5B(9)(B) of the bill defines listed convictions.
The bill would also require criminal history and criminal records checks of employees of child
care organizations. When an offer of initial employment is made to an individual 16 years of age
or older the organization is required to request both checks. Written consent of the individual is
required and the individual must submit his or her fingerprints to the Department of State Police
for the purposes of the required checks. The child care organization may not employ the
individual unless it determines that conditional employment is necessary and it has received the
results of the criminal history check. Criminal history and criminal records checks of existing
employees will be accomplished according to a schedule established by the bill. Where either
check reveals a listed conviction, the child care organization may not hire that employee and
must dismiss existing employees with listed convictions.
The Department of State Police may charge a fee for all criminal history and criminal records
checks required by the bill. The fee may not exceed the actual cost of conducting the check.
A parent or guardian hiring a babysitter may request either a criminal history or criminal records
check or both checks on the individual he or she is planning to hire. The Department of State
Police is required to conduct such checks.
Arguments
For: Child abuse outside the home is very preventable. Legislation enacted earlier has been
effective in protecting children from child abuse and convicted sexual offenders while at school.
However, expansion is necessary to protect children who may encounter potential abusers in
settings outside the school.
Any burdens on the child care industry are a small price to pay for the safety of children. Such
burdens can be largely offset by adjustments in hiring practices and perhaps by extending
somewhat the potential for conditional employment of applicants. Federal financial assistance
may be available to offset some of the financial costs of conducting the required criminal
background checks.
Against: The bill's extensive list of crimes includes several minor transgressions. There is
also concern about who would bear the financial burden of paying for the required criminal
background checks. The vast majority of child care providers and camps are small businesses
who would be financially pinched by the cost of the required criminal background checks.
Employee applicants will be unlikely to apply for such minimum wage positions if they are
responsible for the cost. The bill could also disrupt the operation of certain short-term child care
businesses, like summer camps.
Supporters/Opponents: Spring Hill Camp near Evart has expressed concern about the
impact of the bill on Summer camp operations.
Fiscal Information: The Department of State Police would be responsible for the state portion
of the criminal background check and for assuring the submission of the FBI portion. The bill
would permit the Department of State Police to assess a fee to cover the actual costs of the
checks. Criminal background checks, including both State and FBI fingerprint checks, currently
cost $39. Over 50,000 licensees employing over 250,000 workers would be affected by this bill.
These include day care group homes, family day care homes, child care centers, camps and foster
homes. Turnover in this industry is extremely high, averaging about 25 percent per year. Much
of the employment in the camp sector is seasonal and is limited to the three Summer months.
Administrative Rules: There is no new authority for promulgating administrative rules in
the bill. However, existing administrative rules may need to be revised.