Browsers that can not handle javascript will not be able to access some features of this site.
Skip Navigation
LARA: Michigan Department of Licensing and Regulatory AffairsMichigan.gov: Official Web Site for the State of Michigan
Michigan.gov HomeLARA Home | Sitemap | Contacts | Online Services | Press Releases
Printer Friendly Version Printer Friendly   Text Only Version Text Version  Share this page.
Therapy Accelerator Misadministrations in 2012

Event
Summary A patient undergoing external beam radiation therapy received a fractionated dose of 14 Gy in 2 Gray fractions to an area that was approximately 15.6 cm from the intended treatment site.
Root Cause The treatment error was due to improper marking of the isocenter following laser alignment on the patient's external body contour. A CT scanner table movement was required to align the field set lasers with the anticipated isocenter. The actual direction of the table movement was in the opposite direction than assumed. At that point the isocenter was incorrectly marked. The treatment plan was correctly generated, and the treatment plan was reviewed and received physician and physics approval. Treatment port film verification on the first day of treatment was performed, but there was a failure to recognize the improper location of the isocenter and treatment commenced. A subsequent set of port films were again reviewed and erroneously approved. At the interval of the third porting of the treatment fields it was recognized that the isocenter was far inferior to the anticipated site. At this point treatment was paused.
Corrective Action Corrective action includes re-training personnel on the use of the Tumor-Loc software used with the CT scanner, implementing a policy that all patients are to have the day before their first treatment dedicated to filming instead of trying to perform it on the same day as and immediately prior to their first treatment, and implementation of a double check policy that addresses isocenter placement on the patient, as visualized by the radiation therapist and physicist, dosimetrist or other therapist.
Effect on Patient The facility reviewed the patient dosimetry with regard to the normal tissues unintentionally irradiated and expects no adverse effects in the short or long term related to the seven treatments delivered.

<- Back
Related Content
 •  What Is and What Isn't Covered in the CT Rules
 •  Report and Notification of a CT Medical Event
 •  Calibration - "Traceable to a National Standard"
 •  CT Operator Check of Dose Indicator/Dose Indices
 •  Quality Control Program
 •  Establishment and Review of Scanning Protocols
 •  CT Operator Requirements
 •  Results of the Second Public Hearing on Proposed CT Rules (Posted 12/22/2010)
 •  Second Public Hearing on Proposed CT Rules Scheduled (Posted 9/24/2010)
 •  CT Rules Public Hearing (posted 5/19/2010)
 •  Public Hearing on Proposed CT Rules Scheduled (posted April 13, 2010)
 •  Therapy Accelerator Misadministrations (posted 3/18/2010)
 •  Therapy Accelerator Misadministrations in 2010
 •  Therapy Accelerator Misadministrations in 2008
 •  Therapy Accelerator Misadministrations in 2007
 •  Therapy Accelerator Misadministrations in 2000
 •  Therapy Accelerator Misadministrations in 2002
 •  Therapy Accelerator Misadministrations in 2011
 •  Therapy Accelerator Misadministrations in 2003
 •  Therapy Accelerator Misadministrations in 2004

Michigan.gov Home | LARA Home | State Web Sites | Office of Regulatory Reinvention
Accessibility Policy | Link Policy | Privacy Policy | Security Policy | Michigan News | Michigan.gov Survey


Copyright © 2001-2012 State of Michigan