Browsers that can not handle javascript will not be able to access some features of this site.
Skip Navigation
Michigan Civil Service CommissionMichigan.gov, Official Web site for the State of Michigan
Michigan.gov HomeMCSC Home | Contact MCSC | MCSC Online Services
Printer Friendly Version Printer Friendly   Text Only Version Text Version  Share this page.
December 12, 2002 Commission Minutes

State of Michigan
DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL SERVICE
Civil Service Commission Meeting
December 12, 2002

Present: Susan Grimes Munsell, Chairperson
Robert P. Hunter, Commissioner
Sherry L. McMillan, Commissioner
James P. Pitz, Commissioner
John F. Lopez, State Personnel Director

CALL TO ORDER
1. The meeting of the Civil Service Commission was opened by Civil Service Commission Chairperson Susan Grimes Munsell at 11:00 a.m., in Conference Room A, Lower Level, Capitol Commons Building, 400 S. Pine Street, Lansing, Michigan.
2. Chairperson Munsell announced that Commissioner McMillan’s appointment to the Civil Service Commission has been extended until December 31, 2010. In addition, she noted that Jan Winters was in attendance in her new role as Deputy Director in the Department of Civil Service, directing the activities of Hearings, Employee Relations & Mediation, HRMN, Technical Complaints, and Employee Benefits.
3. On motion duly made and supported, the Commission approved the minutes of the meeting of October 16, 2002.
NEW BUSINESS
1. Carol Vargovich, Chief Financial Officer, Department of Civil Service, reported on financial activities that occurred in fiscal year 02, the certification of the fiscal year 02 payroll, appropriation adjustments to the 03 fiscal year, and the proposal for the fiscal year 04.

On motion duly made and supported, the Commission approved Resolution G-1A, as follows:
The Civil Service Commission, in fulfillment of the Constitutional requirement to certify the aggregate payroll of the classified service for the preceding fiscal year, certifies a payroll of $3,920,131,344, as recorded in the state’s Michigan Administrative Information Network as of November 08, 2002, for the fiscal period October 1, 2001, to September 30, 2002.
On motion duly made and supported, the Commission approved Resolution G-1B, as follows:
1. On December 5, 2002, Governor John Engler issued Executive Order (EO) 2002-22. EO 2002-22 provides for statewide expenditure reductions approximately $460 million and other transfers for the current fiscal year FY 02-03, in order to meet reduced revenue estimates. As part of the statewide reductions, EO 2002-22 provides that the general fund appropriations for the Department of Civil Service be reduced by $250,400 for FY 02-03.
2. Prior to the issuance of EO 2002-22, the State Personnel Director had authorized additional FY 02-03 budget reductions totaling $632,100.
3. The Civil Service Commission recognizes that impending revenue shortfall and the prior actions of the State Personnel Director and, consistent with its constitutional authority, hereby reduces the previously-approved FY 02-03 budget for the Department of Civil Service by $2,196,460.
4. The State Personnel Director is authorized to take any action necessary to implement the provisions of this Resolution so that expenditures of the Department of Civil Service are reduced as specified for FY 02-03.
On motion duly made and supported, the Commission approved Resolution G-1C, as follows:
The Civil Service Commission approves the fiscal year 04 budget proposal for the Department of Civil Service totaling $36,312,000.
2. Carol Mowitz, Compensation Director, Department of Civil Service, briefed the Commission on the Unclassified Salary Proposal for Fiscal Year 2004.

On motion duly made and supported, the Commission approved the staff recommendation to transmit the following compensation recommendations for unclassified positions to the Governor and Legislature for Fiscal year 2004:
A 3 percent merit increase.
Salary adjustments of up to 10 percent based on performance and other relevant factors
Approval by the legislature of line-item funding necessary to support these recommendations.
3. D. Daniel McLellan, General Counsel, Department of Civil Service, reported on the staff recommendation that the commission approve a resolution to accept the transfer of the executive direction and management of the HRMN System into the Department of Civil Service, effective 12/29/02.

On motion duly made and supported, the Commission approved Resolution G-3:

“A resolution of the Michigan Civil Service Commission Regarding the HRMN System Executive Order:
A. DEFINITIONS
1. The “HRMN System” means the Michigan statewide Human Resource Management Network System that delivers payroll, personnel, employee benefits, and other human resource functionality and data exchange, and includes, but is not limited to, the standards, guidelines, processes, procedures, practices, rules, regulations, hardware, and software for the operation of the HRMN System.
2. The “executive direction and management of the HRMN System” means the authority, power, duty, and responsibility for all of the following:
A. To establish, implement and enforce policy standards, guidelines, processes, procedures, practices, rules, and regulations for the operation of the HRMN System, consistent with applicable law.
B. To manage the HRMN System to achieve the business needs for payroll, personnel, employee benefits, and other human resource functions for the State of Michigan.
C. To direct and manage the program development and implementation of changes in the HRMN System.
D. To acquire technology development, services and software for the HRMN system through agency operating agreements between the Department of Civil Service and the Department of Information Technology.
E. To acquire and manage contracts for the HRMN System.
F. To standardize or centralize agency personnel transactions in the HRMN System.
B. BACKGROUND
1. The HRMN System is under the joint executive direction of the directors of the Department of Civil Service, the Office of the State Employer, the Department of Management and Budget, the Office of the State Budget within the Department of Management and Budget, and the Department of Information Technology.
2. The HRMN System is managed by an informal HRMN Systems Coordination Committee consisting of representatives from the Department of Civil Service, the Department of Information Technology, the Office of the State Employer, the State Budget Office with the Department of Management and Budget, and the Department of Treasury.
3. In executive Order 2002-19, effective December 29, 2002, the Governor transferred all of the authority, powers, duties, functions, and responsibilities of the Department of Management and Budget, the Office of the State Employer, the Department of Treasury, and the Department of Information Technology related to the executive direction and management of the HRMN System to the Department of Civil Service.
C. COMMISSION FINDINGS
1. The Civil Service Commission finds that the transfers authorized in Executive Order 2002-19 and the resulting centralization of the executive direction and management of the HRMN System within the Department of Civil Service will result in streamlined business processes, improved service, focused development planning, enhanced flexibility and responsiveness, and improved coordination among all user agencies of the HRMN System.
2. The Civil Service Commission finds that the transfers authorized by the Governor in Executive Order 2002-19 and consented to here do not conflict with the plenary authority of the Civil Service Commission granted to it under Article 11, Section 5, of the Michigan Constitution of 1963.
THEREFORE, the Michigan Civil Service Commission RESOLVES as follows:
1. Effective December 29, 2002, the Department of Civil Service shall accept the transfer of all the authority, powers, duties, functions, and responsibilities of the Department of Management and Budget, the Office of the State Employer, the Department of Treasury, and the Department of Information Technology related to the executive direction and management of the HRMN System, as authorized in Executive Order 2002-19.
2. The State Personnel Director is authorized to do each of the following:
A. To direct and supervise the implementation required by this resolution and Executive Order 2002-19, in cooperation with the Director of the Office of the State Employer, the Director of the Department of Management and Budget, the State Treasurer, and the Director of the Department of Information Technology.
      B. To execute such agreements, documents, or contracts with the Office of the State Employer, the Department of Management and Budget, the Department of Treasury, and the Department of Information Technology on behalf of the Department of Civil Service as may be necessary to implement this resolution and Executive Order 2002-19, including, but not limited to, agreements regarding (1) the delegation of powers or duties to the Department of Civil Service or the State Personnel Director, (2) the transfer of personnel, facilities, equipment, records, property, or funds to the Department of Civil Service for the purpose of operation, maintenance, or management of the HRMN System, and (3) service levels, activities, staffing, operations, and infrastructure support to be provided for the support or operation of the HRMN System.
      C. To take any further action deemed necessary or useful to implement this resolution and Executive Order 2002-19. “
4. D. Daniel McLellan reported that the Troopers and Sergeants Unit went through ACT 312 arbitration, and has submitted their proposed collective bargaining agreement for October 1, 1999 through September 30, 2002. Staff reviewed the proposed CBA and found nothing that violates the rules on prohibited subjects of bargaining. Director Lopez, with the consent of the Commission Chairperson, gave interim approval to the agreement in order for it to be transferred to the Legislature. The Legislature has waived the notice requirement to permit the increases to take effect at a time other than the start of a fiscal year.

On motion duly made and supported, the Commission confirmed the interim approval of the Collective Bargaining Agreement between the Office of State Employer and the Michigan State Police Troopers and Sergeants Unit for the period October 1, 1999, through September 30, 2002.
5. On motion duly made and supported, the Commission approved the Letter of Understanding between the Office of the State Employer and the Michigan State Police Troopers Association regarding utilization of scheduled overtime.
6. D. Daniel McLellan briefed the Commission on the extension of amendments to Rule 2-14, Military Pay. In May 2002, the Commission approved a change in the military leave provisions which extended the pay differential and benefit continuation provisions to nonexclusively-represented employees who were called to active duty after September 11, 2001, to cover all active-duty time between September 11, 2001, and December 31, 2002. The same provisions were also extended to nonexclusively-represented employees on limited-term appointments. Governor Engler asked that the Commission continue these provisions through the remainder of the fiscal year to provide continued, uninterrupted provision of these benefits for employees who are on military leave, and provide the new administration with an opportunity to evaluate further continuation of the provisions.

Staff recommends that the Commission approve these provisions through September 30, 2003, and authorize the State Personnel Director to approve letters of understanding for all current collective bargaining agreements that will provide the same military leave provisions to the exclusively-represented employees.

On motion duly made and supported, the Commission approved Resolution G-6, (Rev B), December 12, 2002 as follows:

The amendments to the Civil Service Rule 2-14, Veterans’ Preference and Military Leave (Rev B, December 11, 2002) are approved effective immediately for all nonexclusively represented employees.

The State Personnel Director is authorized to approve on behalf of the Civil Service Commission any letter of understanding agreed to between the Office of the State Employer and an exclusive representative that provides substantially the same extension of military leave pay differential and benefit continuation for exclusively-represented employees as authorized for nonexclusively-represented employees in the approved amendments to Rule 2-14 (Rev B, December 11, 2002.)

COMMISSION APPEALS

1. In closed session by teleconference on September 26, 2002, the Commission considered 23 decisions of the Employment Relations Board. In closed session on December 12, 2002, the Commission considered 13 decisions of the Employment Relations Board. Copies of the Review Sheets indicating the Commission’s actions on these decisions are on file in the Department of Civil Service.
ADJOURNMENT
  The meeting was adjourned at 11:25 a.m.
    

Note: These Minutes will become final upon approval by the Civil Service Commission.

Related Content
 •  2011 Commission Meeting Minutes
 •  2010 Commission Meeting Minutes
 •  2009 Commission Meeting Minutes
 •  2008 Commission Meeting Minutes
 •  December 19, 2007 Commission Minutes
 •  August 21, 2007 Commission Minutes
 •  2002 Commission Meeting Minutes
 •  2007 Commission Meeting Minutes
 •  2006 Commission Meeting Minutes
 •  2003 Commission Meeting Minutes
 •  2004 Commission Meeting Minutes
 •  2005 Commission Meeting Minutes
 •  May 2, 2007 Commission Minutes
 •  January 31, 2007 Commission Minutes
 •  December 5, 2006 Commission Minutes
 •  October 3, 2006 Commission Minutes
 •  May 2, 2006 Commission Minutes
 •  December 13, 2005 Commission Minutes
 •  September 13, 2005 Commission Minutes
 •  May 17, 2005 Commission Minutes

Michigan.gov Home | MCSC Home | Contact MCSC | State Web Sites
Privacy Policy | Link Policy | Accessibility Policy | Security Policy | Michigan News | Michigan.gov Survey

Copyright © 2001-2011 State of Michigan