|
REGULATION
|
Appointing
Authority Letter Reference:
CS-6966
|
Effective
Date:
January 1, 2002
|
Index Reference:
Performance-pay
|
Regulation
Number:
5.07
|
|
Issuing Bureau:
Human
Resource Services
|
Rule Reference:
Rule 5-3 (Compensation
Schedules)
Rule 4-6
(Senior Executive Service (SES)Rule
4-7 (Senior Executive Management Assistant Service (SEMAS)
|
Replaces:
Reg.
5.07
(CS-6959, October
11, 2001)
|
|
Subject:
PERFORMANCE-PAY
AND IT BONUS PROGRAMS
|
Table
of Contents
- PURPOSE
- CIVIL SERVICE
COMMISSION RULE REFERENCE
- STANDARDS
A. Scope
B. Salary
Range
C. Performance-Pay
D. Performance
Evaluations
E. Salary
Upon Appointment or Conversion to the SES or SEMAS
F. Salary
Upon New Hire or Promotion to a Performance Pay Position in ECP Groups
1, 2, 3, or 4
G. Salary
Upon Conversion to ECP Groups 1, 2, 3, or 4
H. Salary
Upon Reclassification from Staff Attorney to Senior Attorney
I. Salary
Upon Lateral Job Change of IT Program Employees
J. Salary
Upon Reclassification from a Performance-Pay Classification to Another
Performance-Pay Classification with a Higher Control Point
K. Effect
of Position Freeze
L. General
Salary Increases
M. Salary
Upon Conversion from Performance-Pay Schedule to Step Schedule
N. IT Program
Signing Bonus
O. IT Program
Mission Critical Skills Bonus
P. Exceptions
1. PURPOSE
This regulation establishes
the standards for the performance-pay programs and for information technology
signing and mission critical skills bonus payments. Performance-pay programs
are designed to establish and maintain appropriate relationships among
individual and group performance, individual competencies, departmental
objectives, departmental budget, and pay. Eligibility for a performance-pay
award is based upon evaluation of the performance of an individual, a
team of eligible individuals, or an entire agency. The department’s ability
to pay may be considered in setting performance-pay award amounts. The
information technology program signing and mission critical skills bonuses
are designed to be used as recruitment and retention tools.
2. CIVIL
SERVICE COMMISSION RULE REFERENCE
Rule 4-6 Senior
Executive Service (SES)
*
* *
4-6.2(e)(4)
Improper Classification. If the department of civil service determines
that a senior executive service position is not properly classified, an
appointing authority cannot appoint or reappoint any person to the position
or execute a senior executive service position agreement for the position
until the department of civil service has approved an updated position
description and properly classified the position.
* * *
Rule 4-7 Senior
Executive Management Assistant Service (SEMAS)
* * *
4-7.2(e)(4)
Improper Classification. If the department of civil service determines
that a senior executive management assistant service position is not properly
classified, an appointing authority cannot appoint or reappoint any person
to the position or execute a senior executive service position agreement
for the position until the department of civil service has approved an
updated position description and properly classified the position.
*
* *
Rule 5-3 Compensation
Schedules
* * *
5-3-2
Departmental
Salary-range Subdivisions — An appointing authority, with the prior
written approval of the state personnel director, may implement departmental
salary-range subdivisions within a salary range. A salary-range subdivision
must fall within the range of rates of compensation approved by the civil
service commission for the classification. The salary-range subdivision
must be based on relevant, job-related departmental considerations, such
as job complexity, level of responsibility, market conditions, or reporting
relationships. The appointing authority shall publish all approved salary-range
subdivisions for its affected employees.
* * *
5-3.4 Operation
of Compensation Schedules
An employee in
the classified service cannot be paid less than the minimum nor more than
the maximum authorized in the compensation plan, unless authorized by
the state personnel director.
- Initial
appointment. On initial appointment, an employee is paid the minimum
salary step in the salary range unless the appointing authority chooses
to pay a higher initial salary as authorized in the compensation plan.
- Schedules
with steps. If the compensation plan creates steps in the pay
range, an employee receives pay increases in the amounts and at the
intervals provided for in the compensation schedule for the employee’s
classification level. An employee under an unsatisfactory probationary,
interim, or follow-up rating is not eligible for a step increase.
(1) Effective
date. Any pay increase is effective at the beginning of the first
pay period after the employee becomes eligible.
(2) Advancement.
An employee advances in pay by successive steps of the pay range
for the employee’s classification level, as provided in the compensation
plan, unless a special increase is granted in accordance with the
compensation plan.
(3) Reduction
of pay. An appointing authority may, for cause, reduce the pay
of an employee receiving more than the minimum step for the classification
level.
(4) General
schedule revision. If the compensation schedule is amended, an
employee is paid at the salary step corresponding in length of service
to the step at which that employee was being paid in the previous
salary range for the classification level.
- Performance-pay
programs.
(1) Salary
range. For each class of positions in a performance-pay program,
the civil service commission shall approve a salary range that includes
(1) a minimum point, (2) one or more control points, and (3) a
maximum point:
(A) Minimum
point. The minimum point is the lowest base salary payable
to an employee in the classification.
(B) Control
point. The control point is the highest base salary payable
to an employee in the classification.
(C) Maximum
point. The maximum point is the maximum total salary, including
both base salary and any lump sum awards, payable to an employee
in the classification during a fiscal year.
(2) Performance-pay
awards.
(A) Awards
authorized. If an employee’s position is included in a performance-pay
program, the appointing authority, with the approval of the state
personnel director, may award the employee an increase in base
salary or a lump sum award, or both, in accordance with the compensation
plan. The director may set limits on the amount of performance
pay that may be awarded in a fiscal year.
(B) Performance
ratings.
(1) If
the employee receives a needs improvement annual rating or an
unsatisfactory interim or follow-up rating, the employee is
not eligible for a base salary or lump sum award.
(2) If
the employee receives an unsatisfactory interim or follow-up
rating, the appointing authority may reduce the employee’s base
salary in accordance with the compensation plan.
(3) Grievances
regarding performance-pay programs. Performance-pay awards
are discretionary. An employee is not authorized to appeal a
final performance-pay grievance determination unless an appeal
is specifically permitted in this rule or the applicable regulations.
(A) Grievance
and appeal permitted. An employee aggrieved by any of
the following performance-pay actions may file a grievance
and appeal the final determination of the appointing authority
to the department of civil service:
(1) The
employee receives a performance rating recognized by the
department of civil service as less than satisfactory.
(2) The
employee’s pay is reduced.
(3) The
appointing authority does not rate the performance of the
employee at least once annually.
(4) The
performance-pay action is alleged to violate rule 1-8 [Prohibited
Discrimination] or rule 2-10 [Whistleblower Protection
- Grievance
appeal prohibited. In all other cases, an appointing authority
is permitted, but not required, to authorize an employee aggrieved
by a performance-pay action to file a grievance within the
department’s grievance procedure. However, unless expressly
authorized in subsection (c)(3)(A), the employee cannot appeal
a final performance-pay grievance determination of the appointing
authority to the department of civil service. By way of example
only, the following performance-pay actions cannot be appealed
to the department of civil service:
(1) The
amount of a performance-pay award.
(2) The
failure to be awarded a performance-pay award.
(3) The
distribution of a performance-pay award between a base salary
adjustment and a lump sum award.
(4) A
performance evaluation rating recognized by the department
of civil service as satisfactory.
(5) The
performance evaluation or performance-pay award of another
employee.
(6) The
decision to include a position into, or exclude a position
from, a performance-pay program.
(7)
The
performance-pay program itself, including, for example,
the performance standards, departmental evaluation methods,
rating categories, and departmental evaluation methods,
rating categories, and departmental salary-range subdivisions.
- Conversion
of performance-pay schedule to step schedule.
If a classification is converted from a performance-pay schedule
to a schedule with steps, an employee whose position is converted
must be placed at a step at least equal to the employee's base salary
under the performance-pay plan at the time of conversion in accordance
with the regulations.
* * *
3.STANDARDS
- Scope — The
Civil Service Commission has established a performance-pay program
for employees in designated classifications. The performance-pay program
consists of base salary and lump sum awards to be administered within
established pay ranges in accordance with regulations approved by
the state personnel director.
- Salary Range
— The Civil Service Commission fixes the range of rates of compensation
for all classifications.
- Classification
Ranges — The Civil Service Commission, for each classification
level in a performance-pay program, fixes a salary range that consists
of (1) a minimum point, (2) a control point, and (3) a maximum point.
- Departmental
Salary-range Subdivisions — As authorized in rule-5-3.2,
an appointing authority may establish one or more salary-range subdivisions
within a class salary range established by the Civil Service Commission.
Each salary-range subdivision must have a subdivision control point
(a base-pay ceiling) that is less than the control point of the
class. An appointing authority may propose a salary-range subdivision
to the Department of Civil Service. The Department of Civil Service
reviews the proposal and approves or denies the request. If the
Department of Civil Service approves a salary-range subdivision,
the appointing authority must give notice of the subdivision to
each employee whose position is subject to the limits of the subdivision.
- Performance-Pay
— The appointing authority may grant a performance-pay award in
accordance with the standards of this regulation. A performance-pay
award may consist of a base salary increase, a lump sum award, or
a combination of the two.
- Base Salary
Increase — An employee may receive an increase in base salary
up to the lower of (1) the control point for the class or (2) any
applicable base ceiling if the employee’s position is subject to
an approved salary-range subdivision.
- Lump Sum
Award — An employee may receive a lump sum award not to exceed
the difference between the control point and the maximum point.
If the employee’s base salary is below the control point or any
applicable base pay ceiling, the employee may receive both a lump
sum award and an increase in base salary. If the employee’s base
salary is at the control point or any applicable base pay ceiling,
a performance award must be granted in a lump sum only.
- Other Performance-Pay
Conditions
- The total
base salary and lump sum awards received by an employee in any
fiscal year must not exceed the maximum point of the salary range.
- The minimum
point of the salary range is the lowest base-pay salary for an
individual appointed, reclassified, or converted to a classification
in the performance-pay program.
- An employee’s
base salary must not exceed the lower of (1) the control point
or (2) any applicable base pay ceiling if the employee’s position
is subject to an approved salary-range subdivision.
- The total
lump sum award received by an employee in any one fiscal year
must not exceed the amount of the difference between the control
point and the maximum point.
- An employee
must receive a performance rating of "meets expectations," "high
performing," or other equivalent satisfactory rating before receiving
any performance-pay award.
- If an employee
receives an "unsatisfactory" probationary, interim, or follow-up
rating, the employee’s base salary may be reduced. The employee’s
base salary may be reduced by up to 5 percent of
the base salary in any one fiscal year, unless a different percentage
limit is specified for the particular class or group.
- Approval
Required — Each initial rate of pay and each subsequent performance-pay
action for employees in the senior executive service (SES), ECP
Group 4, the senior executive management assistant service (SEMAS),
and the information technology program (ITP) requires prior review
and approval by the state personnel director.
- Request
for Approval of Appointment or Reappointment Pay Rates — The
appointing authority must submit a request for pay approval
to the Department of Civil Service for all appointments and
lateral job changes to SES, ECP Group 4, SEMAS, and ITP positions,
certifying that a performance management plan is in place for
the employee. If the position is in the SES or SEMAS, a limited-term
appointment agreement and certification that Civil Service has
reviewed and approved a current position description must be
submitted with the request. Requests must be submitted before
the close of the pay period in which the appointment or reappointment
would be effective.
- Request
for Approval of Performance-Pay — The appointing authority
must submit a request for pay approval to the Department of
Civil Service via the automated web-based approval process for
all performance-pay base salary and lump sum awards for employees
in SES, ECP Group 4, SEMAS, and ITP positions, certifying that
a performance evaluation has been completed. Requests must be
submitted within seven pay periods of the effective date of
the performance evaluation. Base salary increase retroactivity
may not exceed seven (7) pay periods from the date of receipt
of the request by the Department of Civil Service.
- Request
for Approval of IT Signing Bonus – Approval of a signing
bonus for an IT program employee must be requested at the same
time the request for approval of appointment pay is submitted
via the automated approval process.
- Approval
of Pay Upon Appointment and Performance-Pay — The Department
of Civil Service shall issue approval or disapproval actions
on properly documented appointment pay approval requests within
5 workdays of receipt and on performance-pay approval requests
within 10 work days. Special extenuating circumstances may provide
a basis for approval of retroactivity beyond seven pay periods.
Any requests for consideration of extenuating circumstances
must be approved by the state personnel director.
- Other Conditions
Applicable to ECP Groups 1, 2 and 3 Employees — The following
limits on performance-pay apply to all nonexclusively represented
employees in Groups 1, 2, and 3 of the Equitable Classification
Plan:
- An appointing
authority must submit to the state personnel director a request
to add or delete a classification to or from a performance management
plan. All performance management plans, changes, and additions
must be approved before implementation.
- The maximum
performance-pay increase or decrease in base pay in any one fiscal
year must not exceed 5 percent of the employee’s prior
base salary.
- The total
of all performance base pay increases and lump sum awards during
any one fiscal year must not exceed 5 percent of the employee’s
prior base salary.
- Other Conditions
Applicable to SES, SEMAS, and ECP Group 4 Employees — The following
limits of performance-pay awards apply to all employees in the senior
executive service (SES), senior executive management assistant service,
and Group 4 of the Equitable Classification Plan:
- The maximum
performance-pay increase or decrease in base pay in any one fiscal
year must not exceed 5 percent of the employee’s prior
base salary.
- The total
of all performance base pay increases and lump sum awards during
any one fiscal year must not exceed 10 percent of the employee’s
prior base salary.
- Any performance
award in excess of 5 percent of the employee’s base salary
should typically be in the form of a lump sum award. Before an
award in excess of 5 percent of the employee’s base salary or
in excess of the "department maximum lump sum award" amount is
approved, it must be submitted by the appointing authority to
the state personnel director for review and approval under statewide
performance criteria.
- The following
documentation must be submitted with each request:
- A
statement of support for the award from the department director
— The statement should address the employee’s accomplishments
during the rating period, the importance of the employee’s
achievements to the department’s strategic goal attainment,
and the effort or competencies applied by the employee to
achieve positive results. In addition, if the department is
requesting that the performance award include a base pay increase
in excess of 5%, the reason(s) why a base pay increase is
warranted should be addressed. The statement may address other
factors the director believes should be considered as the
basis for an exceptional award.
- The
employee’s performance standards and evaluation for the rating
period — A copy of the signed and dated performance evaluation
form must be provided that includes the performance factors/objectives,
the relevant competencies, and the supervisor’s evaluation.
- A
completed request for pay approval
form — A Request for Pay Approval for SES/SEMAS and Group
4 Performance-Pay Program form (CS-1725) must be provided
indicating the amount of the award requested. Civil service
staff notifies the appointing authority of approval or disapproval
of the request.
- Other Conditions
Applicable to Attorneys — The following limits on performance-pay
awards apply to all attorneys, irrespective of ECP Group number,
in performance-pay classifications in the department of attorney
general:
- The maximum
performance-pay increase or decrease in base pay in any one fiscal
year must not exceed 8 percent of the employee’s prior
base salary.
- The total
of all performance base pay increases and lump sum awards during
any one fiscal year must not exceed 8 percent of the employee’s
prior base salary.
- Other Conditions
Applicable to IT Program Employees — The following limits on
performance-pay awards apply to all employees in the IT program.
- Information
Technology Programmer/Analysts — The maximum performance-pay
increase or decrease in base pay in any one fiscal year must not
exceed 15 percent of the employee’s prior base salary.
Base salary increases for employees in this classification should
reflect the rate of increase in responsibilities assigned and
the employee’s skill level while the employee progresses from
a developing to an experienced professional. Base increases up
to 15% may be awarded based on satisfactory performance ratings
until the employee reaches the fixed control point or any approved
salary-range subdivision ceiling.
- Information
Technology Specialists and Managers – The maximum performance-pay
increase in base pay in any one fiscal year must not exceed one-half
of the total performance-pay award for that year. Any appointing
authority request to award more than half of the performance-pay
as a base increase must be approved by the state personnel director.
- The total
of all performance base pay increases, lump sum awards, and any
mission critical skills bonus during any one fiscal year, or any
performance-pay decrease, must not exceed 15 percent of
the employee’s prior base salary.
- Working
Out of Class Compensation in Performance-Pay Classifications — Sometimes
an employee in a performance-pay program may be temporarily assigned
to perform the duties and responsibilities of a properly classified
position in a classification with a higher maximum salary rate or
control point. In such circumstances the employee’s base salary
rate must not exceed the midpoint between the employee’s current
base salary and the fixed control point or salary-range subdivisions
of the temporarily assigned classification.
- Performance
Evaluations — The appointing authority must evaluate and rate
each employee in a performance-pay program at least once annually.
The appointing authority may use any reasonable evaluation and rating
methods. However, the appointing authority must report each performance
evaluation to the state personnel director in the manner prescribed
by the director to permit comparison across departments.
- Plan for
Department-wide Evaluation of SES and Group 4 Employees — Each
department must have a plan on file with the state personnel director
that addresses all of the following:
- The annual
cycle for performance evaluation used by the department, including
common review dates, as appropriate, and a plan to convert to
common dates,
- A process
to ensure internal consistency of performance evaluations and
pay recommendations,
- The number
of rating categories used, and, if greater than three, how they
will convert to the statewide reporting categories of high performing/exceeds
expectations, meets expectations, and improvement expected/does
not meet expectations and,
- Measures
to ensure timely submission of performance-pay requests to the
Department of Civil Service for approval.
- Performance
Evaluation Documentation, Audit, and Reporting — The appointing
authority must document and retain for compliance audit by the Department
of Civil Service, the performance plan and evaluation for all employees
in a performance-pay program using the appropriate Department of Civil
Service Performance Management and Competency Employee Rating form
or other form approved by the Department of Civil Service. If an audit
finds performance evaluation documentation is inadequate, the appointing
authority will be required to submit performance evaluation documents
to the Department of Civil Service in order to receive performance-pay
approvals. The appointing authority must report each Group 4, SES,
SEMAS, and ITP employee rating to the Department of Civil Service
via the automated web-based approval process when seeking performance-pay
approval.
- Salary Upon
Appointment or Conversion to the SES or SEMAS — Upon appointment
or conversion to the SES or SEMAS, the base salary rate must be at
or above the minimum point and must not exceed the control point.
The first salary review may be given at the six-month period.
- Salary Upon
New Hire or Promotion to a Performance-Pay position in ECP Groups
1, 2, 3, or 4 — Upon new hire or promotion into a Group 1 (NERE),
Group 2 (NERE), Group 3, or Group 4 class of the Equitable Classification
Plan, the base salary rate must not exceed the midpoint between the
base salary rate received prior to the hire or the promotion and the
control point of the range. If a salary-range subdivision applies,
the base salary rate must not exceed the ceiling of the subdivision.
The first salary review may be given at the six-month period. The
state personnel director may authorize a higher starting rate upon
application by the appointing authority. An appointing authority may
authorize a higher rate without prior approval if any of the following
apply:
- There is difficulty
in recruiting for the particular position.
- The prospective
employee is currently employed outside the classified service and
a salary in excess of the midpoint formula is necessary to attract
the prospective employee.
- The prospective
employee has special experience and education. The background should
be well beyond the minimum qualifications contained in the specification
for classification of the position.
- The prospective
employee is currently a state employee, or has been previously,
and has experience pertinent to the position.
Note: The
appointing authority must document the reason for the higher starting
rate when one of the above conditions applies. The documentation
must be retained for audit purposes.
- Salary Upon
Conversion to ECP Groups 1, 2, 3, or 4 — Upon conversion to a
performance-pay program class in ECP Group 1, 2, 3, or 4, the employee's
current salary is maintained if it is at or above the minimum point
of the range. If the employee’s pre-conversion salary is below the
minimum point, the salary is set at the minimum point. The employee
may be eligible for a performance review and a merit increase at the
six-month point.
- Salary Upon
Reclassification from Staff Attorney to Senior Attorney – Upon
reclassification from Staff Attorney to Senior Attorney, the base
salary rate must not exceed the midpoint between the base salary rate
received prior to the reclassification and the control point of the
Senior Attorney range, or 8% above the base salary rate received prior
to the reclassification, whichever is greater.
- Salary Upon
Lateral Job Change of IT Program Employees — An appointing authority
may not award a bonus or base pay increase to an employee upon lateral
job change between departments in the same classification, unless
an exception approval has been granted by the Department of Civil
Service.
- Salary Upon
Reclassification From a Performance-Pay Classification to Another
Performance-Pay Classification With a Higher Control Point ―
Upon reclassification within the performance-pay program, the
base salary rate must not exceed the midpoint between the base salary
received prior to the reclassification and the control point, or ceiling
of the salary-range subdivision of the new salary range.
- Effect of
Position Freeze — An employee occupying a position frozen for
classification or level in a performance-pay program classification
must receive annual performance evaluations, but is not eligible to
receive a base pay increase unless the maximum salary rate of the
proper classification if a step and grade classification, or the control
point of the proper classification if a performance-pay classification,
exceeds the employee’s base salary rate. An employee occupying a frozen
position is otherwise eligible to receive lump sum performance awards.
- General Salary
Increases — The general pay adjustment is based on the employee’s
base salary on the effective date of the general pay adjustment.
- Salary Upon
Conversion from Performance-Pay Schedule to Step Schedule — If
the state personnel director approves the conversion of an entire
class or part of a class from a performance-pay schedule to a schedule
with steps, the employee is placed at a pay step at least equal to
the employee’s base salary under the performance-pay plan at the time
of conversion. The employee’s hours since last step are set to reflect
the number of hours in pay status since the effective date of the
last performance evaluation, which must be less than 2,080 hours.
If the employee served less than 2,080 hours in the position and has
not received a performance evaluation, the hours since last step are
set to reflect the number of hours in pay status in the position.
- IT Program
Signing Bonus – To attract eligible information technology employees
who possess skills that are in high market demand, a one-time lump
sum bonus of up to $5,000 may be paid with the approval of the Department
of Civil Service. Current classified career information technology
employees are not eligible for the bonus. The bonus is only paid when
necessary to secure a commitment from a highly qualified candidate
and when filling hard-to-fill positions.
- The employee,
hiring manager, and appointing authority must sign an Information
Technology Signing Bonus Repayment Agreement (CS-1741a). The employee
agrees to pay back the entire bonus to the state, including tax
withholding thereon, if the employee leaves the department within
one year of the appointment. Payback remittances are owed and payable
in full within 30 days of the termination date.
- The signing
bonus is paid as a gross pay adjustment with the employee’s first
pay warrant, and is part of the total compensation for the first
week of employment.
- The appointing
authority must retain documentation regarding the salary necessary
to attract, subject to audit by the Department of Civil Service.
- An employee
who receives a signing bonus is not eligible for a mission critical
skills bonus in the same fiscal year.
- IT Program
Mission Critical Skills Bonus — To retain information technology
employees whose skills are needed in a mission critical area as determined
by the department and specifically designated in the employee’s position
description as comprising at least 50 percent of the work, a lump
sum bonus of up to 10 percent of the annual base pay may be paid in
a fiscal year, with the approval of the Department of Civil Service.
- The employee,
the employee’s manager, and the appointing authority must sign an
Information Technology Mission Critical Skills Bonus Repayment Agreement.
The employee agrees to pay back the entire bonus to the state, including
tax withholding thereon, if the employee leaves the department within
one year of the effective date of the bonus. Pay back remittances
are owed and payable in full within 30 days of the termination date.
- The combined
total of the mission critical skills bonus and any performance-pay
award is limited to 15 percent of the base salary for the fiscal
year.
- The bonus cannot
be carried to another department. However, if an employee moves
to another department, the employee is eligible for a mission critical
skills bonus after a year with the new department.
- The appointing
authority must request and receive approval to pay a mission critical
skills bonus from the Department of Civil Service via the web-based
approval process for requesting IT pay approvals.
- Exceptions to
the standards contained in this regulation may be approved by the
state personnel director.
CONTACT
Questions
regarding this regulation should be directed to the Department of Civil
Service, P.O. Box 30002, 400 South Pine Street, Lansing, Michigan 48909,
(517) 335-7862 or (517) 373-7618, or MDCS-BHRS@Michigan.gov.
|
NOTE: Regulations
are issued by the State Personnel Director under authority granted
in the State of Michigan Constitution and the Michigan Civil Service
Commission Rules. Regulations that implement Commission Rules
are subordinate to those Rules.
|
|