The study area
of northeastern Oakland County and southeastern Genesee County is
predominantly rural in nature but is already showing steady signs of
suburban expansion. The
Oakland County portion of the study area is dotted with small lakes and
wetlands while the Genesee portion is characterized by agricultural
activities.
Oakland County is one of the fastest growing counties in Michigan.
The Southeastern Michigan Council of Governments (SEMCOG) projects that the townships surrounding the Oakland County portion of this corridor will be urbanized by the year 2010.
Despite the urbanization in progress, the local residents are interested in maintaining the rural character that the area possesses today.
The purpose of this study is to:
1) Evaluate conditions surrounding the M-15 corridor between I-69 and I-75
2) Develop and evaluate improvement alternatives
3) Narrow those to the practical and feasible alternatives.
Corridor alternatives will be evaluated based on objective criteria
(including cost) in consideration of legal and regulatory requirements,
and in cooperation with the general public and other interested parties.
This will be a
cooperative process, affording early and continuing involvement of the
public, to include affected public agencies, private providers of
transportation, and other interested parties in both Oakland and Genesee
counties. The cooperative
process will establish the range of alternatives for study, such as
alignment, number of lanes, improvements to local roads, other innovative
designs, improved access management, the use of demand management, and
other operational improvements.
The study area
is bounded by I-69 on the north, I-75 on the south and a band which is one mile wide both east and west of M-15.
The boundaries of the study area may be reasonably expanded from
these minimums as a result of the public involvement process.
The minimum
alternatives to be examined are:
1) The no action (no build) alternative
2) Improvements to the M-15 corridor(with and without changes to the local road system)
3) Improvements to the existing local road infrastructure and no major changes to M-15
4) A Transportation Management System alternative.