Cox Files Briefs in Defense of Michigan Civil Rights Initiative
AG Defends Challenge to Michigan Constitutional Amendment
that Prohibits Preferential Treatment by Public Institutions
LANSING - Attorney General Mike Cox today announced that his office filed briefs in the U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals in Cincinnati in defense of the Michigan Civil Rights Initiative, also known as Proposal 2. Proposal 2 is a constitutional amendment passed by voters in 2006 that prohibits public institutions from discriminating against, or granting preferential based on that person's race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin. Cox filed the briefs after two groups - one led by the Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action (BAMN) and another group referred to as Cantrell, lost their challenge against the constitutional amendment at the U.S. District Court in Detroit.
"Three years ago, the citizens of Michigan spoke loud and clear when they overwhelmingly voted to amend our constitution and end the use of preferences in public institutions," said Cox. "I am confident the court will again reject this attempt by activists to overturn the will of the people."
Cox was the only statewide public official to support Proposal 2 in 2006, which was passed by the voters by a margin of approximately 58% to 42%. It then became Article 1, Section 26 of the Michigan Constitution.
In November 2006, a group of plaintiffs lead by BAMN filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court challenging Proposal 2 on federal equal protection grounds. In December 2006, a group known as Cantrell, consisting of university students, prospective students, professors and others filed a second lawsuit against Proposal 2 in the District Court, also on federal equal protection grounds.
On March 18, 2008, the Federal District Court in Detroit agreed with Cox's arguments and ruled that Proposal 2 did not violate the Equal Protection Clause of the United States Constitution. Both groups of plaintiffs appealed that decision to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, leading to today's filing.
In the briefs, Cox argues that Proposal 2 is constitutional because it does not violate concepts of equal protection, it prohibits discrimination in all forms, and it properly eliminates any advantage given to individuals based on race, sex, ethnicity or national origin.
The cases are commonly known as Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, et al. v. Attorney General Mike Cox, and Cantrell, et al. v. Attorney General Mike Cox.
-30-
Printer Friendly
Text Version
Twitter
Facebook
Yahoo
Google
Digg
reddit
Newsvine
StumbleUpon
Bookmark
Email Page
Stay Connected: