Approved: March 31, 1992
ALLOWABLE MARKETING
COST DEDUCTIONS TO SEVERANCE TAX
(Replaces Revenue Administrative Bulletin
1990-13)
RAB-92-9. This bulletin announces an administrative
change in the computation of allowable marketing costs arising
from the use of gas conditioning equipment owned and operated by
the producer. In all other respects, this bulletin restates the
discussion contained in Revenue Administrative Bulletin 1990-13.
The computation of allowable marketing costs is no longer
based upon the full capacity operation of the equipment, but
instead is based upon the actual volume of gas processed through
the equipment.
This bulletin is directed at gas production only, as the
marketing costs for Michigan oil and condensate are nil. It
identifies the marketing costs referenced in Revenue
Administrative Bulletin 1992-5 which can be deducted in
determining the wellhead value for severance tax purposes. These
marketing costs are deductible only when the gas conditioning
equipment is owned and operated by the producer. (Refer to
Revenue Administrative Bulletin 1992-5 for allowable gas
production costs paid to a third party.)
Law
The Michigan severance tax act provides that the value (tax
value) of all production of oil and gas shall be computed at the
wellhead. [MCL 205.303(l); MSA 7.353(l)] If the market is away
from the wellhead, there may be marketing costs allowed as
deductions from the selling price determined at such time as
title to the severed product transfers to the purchaser of the
oil or gas.
Allowable Marketing Costs
For gas production, the following marketing costs are
allowable as deductions from the selling price to arrive at the
wellhead value for severance tax purposes:
- Plant investment, straight-line depreciation for each
year of the statutory period in accordance with
provisions of the Internal Revenue Code;
- Operating costs for each year;
- Return on investment, based on the average prime rate
for the year of production applied against the
average of yearly beginning and ending depreciated
investment;. and
- Direct overhead (i.e., administrative costs directly
allocated to the plant operation).
Note: Normal lease separation is not a marketing cost
and the required equipment up to and through lease separation
shall not be included in the marketing cost computations.
Computation
After the marketing costs are determined, they must be divided
by the actual throughput volume of product for the plant
equipment to arrive at the per thousand cubic feet (MCF) or per
million british thermal units (MMBTU) allocation.
The allowable marketing cost deduction for future years would
be based upon either:
- The average MCF or MMBTU cost for the past four
years, or
- The MCF or MMBTU cost computed for the previous year.
At the end of each subsequent year, the actual costs must be
determined and adjustments must be made for any difference
between the actual marketing costs and the estimate.