The web Browser you are currently using is unsupported, and some features of this site may not work as intended. Please update to a modern browser such as Chrome, Firefox or Edge to experience all features Michigan.gov has to offer.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Regarding Sale Of Bell Memorial To LifePoint
This page answers frequently asked questions regarding the Attorney General's review of the sale of Bell Memorial Hospital to LifePoint. Bell Memorial and LifePoint signed an asset purchase agreement on June 19, 2013. The Attorney General approved the sale on November 27, 2013.
1. Where can I find documents related to this transaction?
To promote transparency and inform the public, the Attorney General will post documents.
2. Why is Bell Memorial selling to LifePoint?
Bell Memorial has represented to the Attorney General that it is selling to pay off financial liabilities, to improve quality of care, and to preserve and expand services. As part of the review, the Attorney General will review these representations.
3. How was a buyer chosen? Why LifePoint?
The Attorney General will review these questions to ensure a fair process and to verify that Bell Memorial received fair market value for its charitable assets.
4. Who is LifePoint?
LifePoint Hospitals is a publicly-traded company from Tennessee. It operates nearly sixty hospitals in 20 different states; most of these hospitals are located in rural areas. In August 2012, a joint venture of LifePoint and Duke University Health System purchased Marquette General Hospital. This was LifePoint's first acquisition in Michigan. For details on that sale, which the Attorney General also reviewed, visit the Marquette General Hospital page.
5. What happens to the proceeds from the sale?
Michigan law requires that charitable assets be used for charitable purposes. Consistent with this, Bell Memorial represents that the proceeds from the transaction will be used to create a small, locally-governed charitable foundation. As more information is publicly available, the Attorney General will update this page.
6. What happens to Bell Memorial after the sale?
Bell Memorial will continue to serve the medical needs of the local community, albeit with a new owner - LifePoint Hospitals. Bell Memorial has represented that, under LifePoint's ownership, core services will continue and that there will be no major changes to either hospital management or employees. As part of his review, the Attorney General will consider these representations.
7. The parties signed a Letter of Intent and, a few months later, signed an asset purchase agreement. What does this mean?
In March, the parties signed a Letter of Intent, or LOI, and began working towards a definitive agreement. In June, the parties reached a definitive agreement when they signed the Asset Purchase Agreement (APA). The APA provides the terms of the sale and also includes certain conditions that must be met - including the consent or no objection of the Attorney General - before the sale can be consummated at closing. Closing is expected by October 31, 2013. In the meantime, the parties are preparing for closing and the Attorney General is reviewing the sale.
8. Why is the Department of Attorney General involved?
In general, the Attorney General protects charitable assets in Michigan under broad common law and statutory authority. This authority extends over the merger or sale of charitable nonprofit corporations, which includes most of Michigan's hospitals. Primarily, the Attorney General reviews these transactions to protect the charitable assets and to ensure that they are not diverted for private benefit. The Attorney General also protects restricted charitable assets, i.e., those assets that were donated for a specific purpose, to prevent these assets from being misused. For a guideline of the Attorney General's review process, see here.
9. How is the Attorney General involved in this specific transaction?
More specifically, the Attorney General is reviewing this transaction because the parties have conditioned the sale on receiving the Attorney General's consent or lack of objection. In other words, the parties recognize the Attorney General's authority in this area, are cooperating with the Attorney General's review process, and recognize that his objection would stop the sale.
10. What does the Attorney General review?
The Attorney General's Review Process provides guidelines for the issues the Attorney General considers, but here are some of the main areas:
- Valuation - What is the fair market value of the charitable assets? Is the buyer receiving sufficient consideration, i.e., money or value, in exchange for the assets being sold? In some instances, the Attorney General asks the parties to fund independent experts to assist in answering these questions.
- Financial evaluation of buyer - Does the buyer have the financial resources to meet its promises? For example, if the buyer proposes capital improvements or expansion of services, can it meet those promises?
- Process review - What process and events led the seller to propose a sale? Was the process fair? Were there conflicts of interests for board members and/or management? Did the seller diligently exercise its duties of loyalty and care to the organization?
- Restricted charitable assets - Do any restricted charitable assets exist, i.e., assets donated for a specific purpose? Will these assets be adequately protected during the sale?
- Post-transaction enforcement - How will the buyer be held to its promises? Will an independent charitable foundation monitor the buyer's post-transaction performance and have enforcement authority?
11. Will the Attorney General report the results of his review to the public?
Yes. The Attorney General completed his review on November 27, 2013. His final report is available on the Marquette General Hospital page.
12. Will there be a way for the general public to offer their views regarding the proposed sale?
The Attorney General hosted a public forum on September 24, 2013, in Ishpeming, Michigan at the Country Village Banquet and Conference Center. A transcript is available here. The Attorney General also accepted written comments from the public through September 30, 2013.
Last updated: December 2, 2013