National HIV Behavioral Surveillance
National HIV Behavioral Surveillance (NHBS): To Better Understand Risk
Analyses and Reports:
IDU1 Report1: Injection Drug Use in the Wayne County Area, 2005 (PDF) Released Summer, 2009
HET1 Report: Heterosexuals living in "High Risk" Areas in SE Michigan, 2007
NHBS HET1 Partner Study Report, 2007
NHBS HET1 Partner Study Presentation, 2007
NHBS HET1 Partner Study Presentation, 2007- presented at Michigan HIV/AIDS Council, November 17, 2011
NHBS-IDU2 Fact Sheet: Fact Sheet from Interviews among Injecting Drug Users in Metro Detroit 2009
(PDF) Released October 2012
MSM2 Report: Men who Have Sex with Men in the Detroit area, 2008 (PDF) Released October 2012
MSM2 Fact Sheet: Fact Sheet from Interviews among Men who Have Sex with Men in Wayne County, 2008
(PDF) Released April 2011
HIV Behavioral Surveillance Interview (Young MSM sub-study ages 13-24), 2009 (PDF) Released July 2010
Summary of Project:
The National HIV Behavioral Surveillance System is a multisite project funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). NHBS was established to identify behaviors that place individuals at-risk for contracting HIV/AIDS. NHBS operates through activities designed to monitor HIV risk behaviors in order to assist in prevention education, service initiatives, and allocation of prevention resources. Nationally, data is collected in 21 metropolitan areas2 that have the highest prevalence of HIV/AIDS cases. The project occurs in multiple cycles with each year targeting one of three high-risk populations including: a) men who have sex with men (NHBS-MSM); b) intravenous drug users (NHBS-IDU); and c) heterosexuals at risk for contracting HIV (NHBS-HET).
NHBS activities include: a) core questionnaire that addresses the following areas: demographics, sexual history, alcohol and drug use history, HIV testing history, incarceration history, and prevention activities; b) local questionnaire that was developed based on input from service providers, community leaders, and individuals living in the metro Detroit areas; and c) HIV testing. All activities are anonymous. NHBS recruitment methodologies vary according to cycles. Respondent Driven Sampling (RDS) was implemented for IDU1 and HET1 cycles and Venue Based Sampling was used for MSM1 cycle.
Inception of Behavioral Surveillance in Michigan:
Michigan has participated in numerous HIV surveillance activities and interview studies since 1986. Prior to National HIV Behavioral Surveillance (NHBS), Michigan participated in the HIV Testing Survey (HITS) where we interviewed STD clients, injecting drug users (IDU) via street intercepts and men who have sex with men (MSM) in gay bars. After HITS, Detroit was one of three sites selected to do a pilot for the IDU cycle of NHBS. We successfully tested 2 recruitment methodologies: Respondent Driven Sampling (RDS) and Targeted Driven Sampling (TDS). Our shared experience was instrumental in choosing the sampling method that would be used for all sites during data collection for the IDU1 cycle. In 2005, we received funding to participate in NHBS. Under the name of Project ASK, we successfully interviewed and collected data from 512 IDU's for the first cycle of NHBS. In 2005, we also participated in the High Risk Area (HRA) pre-pilot for the HET cycle to explore strategies for identifying HRAs. The pre-pilot involved mapping a variety of data using GIS software, and the results were presented at the CDC's National Principal Investigator meeting in October 2005. Michigan has been instrumental in providing service/ support for data collection methodologies in relation to NHBS. We have received funding for NHBS since 2005 and have completed data collection for NHBS- IDU1 (2005), HET1(2007), and MSM2 (2008)cycles.
2009 Data collection activities:
Injecting Drug Users in Wayne County using Respondent Driven Sampling methodology. Data collection through December 15, 2009.
1The first national IDU1 data was published in Spring 2009 (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2009), and a comprehensive IDU1 surveillance summary will be published in the future.
2Atlanta, GA; Baltimore, MD; Boston, MA; Chicago, IL; Dallas, TX; Denver, CO; Detroit, MI; Houston, TX; Los Angeles, CA; Miami, FL; Nassau-Suffolk, NY; New Orleans,LA; New York, NY; Newark, NJ; Philadelphia, PA; San Diego, CA; San Francisco, CA; San Juan, PR; St. Louis, MO; and Seattle, WA; Washington, DC. Together, these areas account for over 60% of cumulative AIDS cases in the United States (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2009).
For more information, please contact Emily Higgins at 313/876-0176
You must have the Adobe Acrobat Reader installed in order to properly view the PDF documents. You can get a free copy of this software by visiting Adobe's website .