Approved: May 27, 1988
INDIVIDUAL INCOME TAX
- S CORPORATION DISTRIBUTIVE INCOME AND LOSSES
(Replaces Income Tax Bulletin 1985-2)
RAB-88-16. The purpose of this Bulletin is to clarify
the income tax and intangibles tax treatment of income
distributed by an S corporation (formerly referred to as a
subchapter S corporation) that has business activity within and
without Michigan. This bulletin supersedes Income Tax Bulletin
1985-2, dated October 1, 1985.
Income Tax
In Chocola v Department of Treasury, 422 Mich
229; 369 NW2d 943 (1985), the Michigan Supreme Court held that a
subchapter S corporation's distributive share of income and
losses shall be allocated and apportioned to the state in which
the activity takes place. The court cited with approval the
Department of Treasury Rule 1979 AC, R 206.12(20) which states
"[d]istributive income from a subchapter S corporation not
allocated or apportioned to Michigan may be claimed as a
subtraction from adjusted gross income. Conversely, losses not
allocated or apportioned to Michigan shall be added to adjusted
gross income."
Prior to the Chocola decision, the Department followed
the decision of the State Board of Tax Appeals, Craighead
v Department of Treasury (Docket Nos. 1275 and 1364,
September 22, 1978) holding that distributions from a subchapter
S corporation were nonbusiness income allocable to the taxpayer's
state of residency. However, preceding this decision, the
Department relied on R 206.12 for apportionment and allocation of
S corporation income. The Rule provides in part that:
R. 206.12 Allocation and Apportionment of Income
(17) All distributive income from a subchapter S
corporation includable in shareholder's adjusted gross income
is subject to tax if allocated or apportioned to Michigan.
(20) Distributive income from a subchapter S corporation
not allocated or apportioned to Michigan may be claimed as a
subtraction from adjusted gross income. Conversely, losses
not allocated or apportioned to Michigan shall be added to
adjusted gross income.
Michigan's Income Tax Act, MCL 206.102, provides that a
taxpayer's taxable income from income-producing activities
confined solely within this state shall be allocated to Michigan.
However, if the business activity is conducted both within and
without Michigan, the income shall be subject to formulary
apportionment as provided in MCL 206.103 and MCL 206.115,
respectively.
Nonresident Shareholder
A nonresident shareholder of a Michigan S corporation must
file a Michigan income tax return and report his or her
distributive income from the corporation. The statute of
limitations is suspended during the period for which a return has
not been filed.
All Shareholders
A shareholder who relied on the Craighead decision,
which allocated S corporation income to a shareholder's state of
residency, must file an amended return (MI-1040X) to properly
report the income based on R 206.12.
Intangibles Tax
The Michigan intangibles tax is a tax on intangible personal
property. The Chocola decision discussed above does not
apply to the Intangibles Tax Act as it relates to a shareholder's
investment in an S corporation.
The intangibles tax is imposed upon all intangible personal
property owned by a resident of the State of Michigan. [See MCL
205.131 et seq.] For intangibles tax purposes, the tax base of an
S corporation is the yield or amount of distributions to the
shareholder(s) during the taxable year. This position is
supported by the Rosenbalm v Department of Treasury,
164 Mich App 99; 416 NW2d 343 (1987), application for leave to
appeal pending.