Skip to main content

Letter Ruling 2014-2

Administration of 2013 PA 160 and 2013 PA 234

You have asked several questions about the so-called “tax on the difference” laws recently passed. Specifically, 2013 PA 160 and 2013 PA 234 (Act or Acts) reduce the tax base of eligible motor vehicle and titled watercraft purchases by altering the definitions of “sales price” and “purchase price” in the General Sales Tax Act (GSTA) and the Use Tax Act (UTA) respectively. Effective December 15, 2013, credit given for eligible motor vehicles used as partial payment for another eligible motor vehicle will not be subject to tax on the agreed-upon value of the trade-in up to $2,000. The Acts increase the amount of deduction that is available over time. For a schedule of increases see 2013 PA 160 and 2013 PA 234; MCL 205.51(1)(d)(xii) and MCL 205.92(f)(xii). The Acts require that the agreed upon value of the trade-in be separately stated on the invoice, bill of sale, or other document given to the purchaser. Effective November 15, 2013, credit for the agreed-upon value of eligible titled watercraft used as partial payment for the purchase of a new or used titled watercraft is not subject to tax up to the full value of the trade-in. Your questions and our answers are listed below.

Q1.      What vehicle qualifies as a “motor vehicle” for purposes of the Acts?

A1.       Only a vehicle that is required to be registered and titled under the Michigan Vehicle Code (MVC) (MCL 257.216) or meets the MVC definition of “recreational vehicle” (MCL 257.49a) qualify for the deduction.

Q2.      Do the Acts require both the traded-in watercraft and the purchased watercraft to be titled to qualify for the deduction?

A2.       Yes, both the traded-in watercraft and the purchased watercraft must be titled to qualify for the deduction.

Q3.      Does titled watercraft qualify for the deduction when used as partial payment for an eligible motor vehicle or recreational vehicle?

A3.       Titled watercraft used as partial payment for a motor vehicle or recreational vehicle does not qualify for the deduction; likewise, a motor vehicle or recreational vehicle used as partial payment for a titled watercraft does not qualify for the deduction.

Q4.      Are the Acts only applicable when the selling party is a watercraft dealer, new vehicle dealer, or a secondhand vehicle dealer?

A4.       Yes, the deduction is limited to eligible titled watercraft and motor vehicles when the seller is either a watercraft dealer or a new or secondhand vehicle dealer under MCL 257.248.

Q5.      Is a motor vehicle, recreational vehicle, or titled watercraft with negative equity eligible for the deduction?

A5.       Yes. When a dealer accepts a trade-in with negative equity it will pay off the customer’s loan on the vehicle and then add the difference between the loan amount and the amount of the trade-in to the purchase price of the new vehicle. In this case the dealer may still claim the deduction up to the value of the loan it pays off for the trade-in subject to the same $2,000 limitation for trade-ins that do not involve negative equity.

Q6.      Does a consumer incur a use tax liability on the trade-in value of a vehicle or watercraft when he or she purchases a vehicle or watercraft from an out-of-state dealer?

A6.       Yes. The deduction for motor vehicles and recreational vehicles is only available when the seller is a licensed Michigan dealership pursuant to MCL 257.248. Therefore, if a vehicle is purchased from a dealership that is not licensed in Michigan it is not eligible for the deduction.

The deduction for titled watercraft is available if the seller is a watercraft dealer in any state engaged in the business of regularly buying and selling watercraft.

Q7.      Does the deduction apply to lease transactions?

A7.       No, the deduction does not apply to lease transactions.

April 14, 2014

LR 2014-2

Michael A. Eschelbach

Director, Bureau of Tax Policy