The Michigan Department of Attorney General utilizes the services of Special Assistant Attorneys General from time to time when the unique circumstances of a particular case create the need for specialized services not currently available within the department.
The Michigan Attorney General has determined that a full and complete investigation of what happened within the Catholic Church is required. This investigation is and will continue to be independent, thorough, transparent, and prompt. My department and this investigation will find out who knew what, and when.
The Conviction Integrity Unit (the “CIU”) investigates claims of innocence to determine whether there is clear and convincing new evidence that the convicted defendant was not the person who committed the offense.
In Michigan, a victim is an individual who suffers direct or threatened physical, financial, or emotional harm as a result of the commission of a crime.
The laws regarding expungement of criminal offenses in Michigan changed in major ways in April of 2021. This page is designed to help applicants navigate their way through the new laws, help them determine if they are eligible to have convictions expunged, to answer frequently asked questions about the new laws, and to provide links for resources and assistance.
To investigate and prosecute hate crimes by following up on every credible tip and offer departmental resources to assist local and federal law enforcement partners in this effort.
The Michigan Attorney General is leading the fight against this horrific crime by prosecuting the state's first-ever criminal cases under state law banning human trafficking in Michigan. Victims of human trafficking are in bondage through force, fraud or coercion, for the purpose of sex or labor exploitation.
Knowing how to guard your personal information is your first line of defense against identity theft.
Michigan Attorney General's robocall initiative is leading several efforts to protect Michigan residents from the billion plus robocalls made to them every year.
Michigan's Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), MCL 15.231 et seq, provides that requesters can receive copies or make inspections of most public records of public bodies upon written request.
The Open Meetings Act (OMA) took effect January 1, 1977. In enacting the OMA, the Legislature promoted a new era in governmental accountability and fostered openness in government to enhance responsible decision making.1 Nothing in the OMA prohibits a public body from adopting an ordinance, resolution, rule, or charter provision that requires a greater degree of openness relative to public body meetings than the standards provided for in the OMA. 2
Search is currently unavailable. Please try again later.
The web Browser you are currently using is unsupported, and some features of this site may not work as intended. Please update to a modern browser such as Chrome, Firefox or Edge to experience all features Michigan.gov has to offer.
May 07, 2025
LANSING – Yesterday, the Supreme Court ruled that the Trump Administration can enforce its ban on transgender troops serving in the military, a plan which had temporarily been blocked by lower courts but will now remain in place while challenges move forward in the courts. Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel, who filed an amicus brief to support a lawsuit aiming to block the implementation of President Donald Trump’s executive order banning transgender people from serving in the military, issued the following statement in response:
“I am, quite simply, appalled by this decision from the Supreme Court. The Department of Justice has effectively admitted its transgender military ban has nothing to do with these individuals’ ability to serve or any concerns about military readiness. Instead, it’s rooted entirely in bias and discrimination.
“By allowing this ban to move forward while the legal challenges are still underway, the Court is sending an ominous signal that it may be willing to let the government impose harmful and unjustified restrictions on disfavored minorities without any legitimate justification.
“In the Supreme Court’s Obergefell decision, the majority made clear that the government cannot discriminate against same-sex couples just because of who they are, and that animus alone can never drive legitimate government policy. That principle now seems to be at risk. Let’s be clear: The Trump Administration never claimed that these transgender service members were doing anything wrong or weren’t serving their country honorably. This is not about performance. It’s about prejudice.
“In addition to being unlawfully discriminatory, this ban strikes an extremely reckless blow to our nation’s military capability. These troops, who will be ousted for no legitimate reason, are ready, willing, and able to serve their country with honor. Removing them doesn’t just strip our military of qualified personnel – it undermines the morale of the service members who served alongside them and represents a waste of the millions of taxpayer dollars that were spent to train these troops.
“Despite this troubling decision, it is my hope that the rule of law will ultimately prevail, and that this dangerous and illegal executive order will be overturned."
###
Media Contact:
Interim Final Rule Walks Back Requirement to Affirmatively Further Fair Housing