The Michigan Department of Attorney General utilizes the services of Special Assistant Attorneys General from time to time when the unique circumstances of a particular case create the need for specialized services not currently available within the department.
The Michigan Attorney General has determined that a full and complete investigation of what happened within the Catholic Church is required. This investigation is and will continue to be independent, thorough, transparent, and prompt. My department and this investigation will find out who knew what, and when.
The Conviction Integrity Unit (the “CIU”) investigates claims of innocence to determine whether there is clear and convincing new evidence that the convicted defendant was not the person who committed the offense.
In Michigan, a victim is an individual who suffers direct or threatened physical, financial, or emotional harm as a result of the commission of a crime.
The laws regarding expungement of criminal offenses in Michigan changed in major ways in April of 2021. This page is designed to help applicants navigate their way through the new laws, help them determine if they are eligible to have convictions expunged, to answer frequently asked questions about the new laws, and to provide links for resources and assistance.
To investigate and prosecute hate crimes by following up on every credible tip and offer departmental resources to assist local and federal law enforcement partners in this effort.
The Michigan Attorney General is leading the fight against this horrific crime by prosecuting the state's first-ever criminal cases under state law banning human trafficking in Michigan. Victims of human trafficking are in bondage through force, fraud or coercion, for the purpose of sex or labor exploitation.
Knowing how to guard your personal information is your first line of defense against identity theft.
Michigan Attorney General's robocall initiative is leading several efforts to protect Michigan residents from the billion plus robocalls made to them every year.
Michigan's Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), MCL 15.231 et seq, provides that requesters can receive copies or make inspections of most public records of public bodies upon written request.
The Open Meetings Act (OMA) took effect January 1, 1977. In enacting the OMA, the Legislature promoted a new era in governmental accountability and fostered openness in government to enhance responsible decision making.1 Nothing in the OMA prohibits a public body from adopting an ordinance, resolution, rule, or charter provision that requires a greater degree of openness relative to public body meetings than the standards provided for in the OMA. 2
Search is currently unavailable. Please try again later.
The web Browser you are currently using is unsupported, and some features of this site may not work as intended. Please update to a modern browser such as Chrome, Firefox or Edge to experience all features Michigan.gov has to offer.
May 08, 2025
LANSING – Yesterday, the Michigan Department of Attorney General’s Corporate Oversight Division Chief Jason Evans testified before the Senate Committee on Finance, Insurance, and Consumer Protection in support of Senate Bill 134, sponsored by Senator Sam Singh, announced Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel. The legislation would help the millions of Michigan consumers who currently stand legally helpless against predatory, deceptive, and unaccountable commercial operators because of misinterpretations of the Michigan Consumer Protection Act (MCPA).
“While the Michigan Consumer Protection Act does still cover some unscrupulous practices, it leaves thousands of Michiganders unprotected from price gouging at grocery stores or deceptive sales contracts at used car dealerships – all because these acts are committed by licensed businesses,” Nessel said. “This legislation would restore the MCPA’s original purpose: protecting Michigan’s residents from deceptive and predatory conduct.”
“The changes made by Senate Bill 134 would greatly strengthen our consumer protection act and provide real protections to Michigan consumers and small businesses targeted by unscrupulous people,” Evans said. “This is particularly important in a time when federal consumer protection efforts are being significantly scaled back.”
The Attorney General and the Consumer Protection Team receive over 10,000 consumer complaints each year. However, since the Michigan Supreme Court decisions in Smith v. Globe Life Ins. Co. and Liss v. Lewiston-Richards, Inc., Michigan now has one of the most limited consumer protection acts in the country. These decisions preclude state investigation of suspected illegal business practices when the target business sells products or services authorized for sale by a law administered by a state or federal agency, irrespective of allegations pertaining to how they conduct that business. Senate Bill 134 would enable these companies to be investigated by the Department of Attorney General and strengthen Michigan’s consumer protections to match those of other states.
Attorney General Nessel has also launched an investigation into insulin manufacturer Eli Lilly and has asked the Michigan Supreme Court to reconsider the two previous rulings that hinder the Department’s ability to take action against drug manufacturers and other regulated/licensed entities under the MCPA. The Court heard oral arguments in that matter last year and issued an order posing additional questions that are being briefed by the parties ahead of an anticipated second argument.
The bill would also provide the Department of Attorney General with the ability to issue investigative demands to investigate alleged violations of the MCPA and enhance penalties for violations targeting the elderly and vulnerable adults.
###
Media Contact:
Interim Final Rule Walks Back Requirement to Affirmatively Further Fair Housing