The web Browser you are currently using is unsupported, and some features of this site may not work as intended. Please update to a modern browser such as Chrome, Firefox or Edge to experience all features Michigan.gov has to offer.
November 2007
Name | Subject Matter | Date Issued | Case Number |
City of Dearborn |
Unfair Labor Practice Not Found – Elimination of a Position is an Employer’s Prerogative Where There is no Direct Impact on Incumbent Employees and No Transfer of Work Out of the Bargaining Unit has Occurred; Employer is Only Required to Bargain in Good Faith Regarding the Impact of a Legitimate Reorganization Plan; By Failing to Demand Bargaining, Union Waived its Right to Bargain |
11/09/07
|
C05 K-284 |
Wayne County |
Unfair Labor Practice Not Found – Employee’s Charge Fails to State a Claim Against Employer under PERA; Charge failed to Allege that Employer’s Actions were Motivated by Union or Other Protected Activity. Charge Did Not State a Breach of Duty of Fair Representation Claim; No Allegation That Union’s Action was Arbitrary, Capricious or Motivated by Bad Faith. Charges Barred by Statute of Limitations; Events Leading to Filing of Charges Occurred Several Years Before Charges Filed. |
11/09/07
|
C07 D-084 & CU07 D-019 |
Lansing School District |
Unit Clarification Petition Dismissed –Position at Issue is Not New and Has Not Undergone Recent Substantial Changes; Unit Clarification is Inappropriate for Upsetting an Agreement or Established Practice Regarding Unit Placement; Where an Employee or Group of Employees has Been Historically Excluded from an Established Bargaining Unit, Question of Representation Can Only be Resolved Through Filing of a Proper Petition for a Representation Election. |
11/09/07
|
UC05 K-040 |
Interurban Transit Partnership |
Unfair Labor Practice Not Found – Where Charge Alleges Unilateral Change in Terms and Conditions of Employment, Statute of Limitations Runs from Date Employer Announces Decision; Charge Was Untimely When Not Filed Within Six Months of Announcement; Separate Instances of Subcontracting were Separate Events Involving Separate Decision by Employer and Requiring Separate Notices to Union; Premature Declaration of Impasse Not a Violation of Duty to Bargain Where There is no Evidence that Employer Refused to Meet After Impasse was Declared or that Union Made a Request to Meet |
11/08/07
|
C04 F-152 |
City of Livonia |
Representation Election Directed – Bargaining Unit Comprised of Regular Part-Time Employees in Positions Designated by City as Temporary Part-Time; Temporary Part-Time Employees Who Work Consistently for Employer Have Continued Interest in Terms and Conditions of Employment and are not Casual Employees; Despite Employer Designation of Positions as Temporary, Employees May Have Reasonable Expectation of Continued Employment. Employees Irregular and Widely Varying Schedules Do Not Preclude a Finding That They are Regular Employees if They Consistently Work Schedule After Schedule. |
11/07/07
|
R06 G-075 |
Michigan State Government This page last updated 12/05/07 |