The web Browser you are currently using is unsupported, and some features of this site may not work as intended. Please update to a modern browser such as Chrome, Firefox or Edge to experience all features Michigan.gov has to offer.
March 2012
Name
|
Subject Matter
|
Date Issued
|
Case Number
|
Topic(s)
|
Grand Rapids Public School -and- Cyndie Peters |
20 Day Order - MERC no longer prepares summaries on decisions without exceptions. |
3/28/12
(20 Day Order) |
C11 L-212 |
Failure to state a claim; Failure to Respond to Show Cause Order |
Oakland Schools Intermediate District -and- Oakland Technical Center Education Association -and- Denise Maser |
20 Day Order - MERC no longer prepares summaries on decisions without exceptions. |
3/28/12
(20 Day Order) |
C11 K-203 & CU11 K-034 | Duty of Fair Representation; Failure to Respond to Show Cause Order; Statute of limitations |
City of Detroit -and- AFSCME Council 25, Local 542 -and- Nicole Wright |
20 Day Order - MERC no longer prepares summaries on decisions without exceptions. |
3/28/12
(20 Day Order) |
C11 K-196 & CU11 K-031 | Failure to state a claim; Failure to Respond to Show Cause Order; Duty of Fair Representation |
Michigan Association of Police -and- Thomas Ash |
20 Day Order - MERC no longer prepares summaries on decisions without exceptions. |
3/22/12
(20 Day Order) |
CU10 L-047 | Duty of Fair Representation |
Village of Holly -and- Teamsters Local 214 -and- Andrea S. Eastman |
20 Day Order - MERC no longer prepares summaries on decisions without exceptions. |
3/22/12
(20 Day Order) |
CU10 E-018 | Duty of Fair Representation, Statute of limitations |
Leelanau County and Leelanau County Sheriff |
20 Day Order - MERC no longer prepares summaries on decisions without exceptions. |
3/22/12
(20 Day Order) |
C11 H-134 | Duty to Bargain; pending representation petition |
Charter Township of Kinross |
20 Day Order - MERC no longer prepares summaries on decisions without exceptions. |
3/20/12
(20 Day Order) |
C10 I-237 | Interference with protected concerted activity; Duty to Bargain; pending representation petition |
City of Dearborn |
Unfair Labor Practice Found- Respondent Violated the Weingarten rights of Charging Party’s Member by Interfering and Refusing to Allow a Union Representative to be Present During an Investigatory Interview that the Employee Reasonably Believed Could Lead to Discipline; Criminal Investigatory Interviews Not Per Se Excluded from Weingarten Protections If Employee Reasonably Believes that the Interview Might Result in Discipline by the Employer; An Employee’s Request for Union Representation Need Not Contain Special Words or Phrases, Only Reasonable Notice Is Required. Weingarten Remedy Limited to a Posting Requirement Where the Employee’s Termination Was Based on Independent Information from a Properly Conducted Separate Investigation. |
3/16/12
|
C09 A-005 | Weingarten rights |
City of Detroit |
Amended Charge Dismissed:All Charges are Subject to Six Month Statute of Limitations; Where Amended Charge Does Not Relate Back to Original Charges Amendment Must Be Filed within Six Months of the Date the Charge Accrued; Amended Charge Did Not Relate Back to Original Charge Because It Raised Different Legal Issues and Was Based on Different Facts. Respondent’s Post Hearing Brief Stricken from the Record: ALJ Has Authority to Reject Motions and Pleadings That Do Not Conform to Commission Rules; ALJ May Act on Own Motion to Order Party to Show Cause Why Party's Defective Documents Should Not Be Stricken from Record. Respondent's Refusal to Properly Respond to ALJ’s Order is Act of Contempt. |
3/15/12
|
C07 B-030 | Statute of Limitations- Amended Charge-ALJ’s Authority |
Michigan State Government This page last updated 9/19/12 |