Bureau of Services for Blind Persons
Michigan Career & Technical Institute
Michigan High-Speed Internet Office
Michigan Rehabilitation Services
Workers' Disability Compensation Agency
Black Leadership Advisory Council
Michigan Community Service Commission
Executive Order 2020-107 established Michigan Workforce Development Board
MiSTEM convenes a statewide network of leaders in education, business and local communities to empower the next generation of innovators.
Unemployment Insurance Appeals Commission
formerly MI Compensation Appellate Commission
Search is currently unavailable. Please try again later.
The web Browser you are currently using is unsupported, and some features of this site may not work as intended. Please update to a modern browser such as Chrome, Firefox or Edge to experience all features Michigan.gov has to offer.
|
Name
|
Subject Matter
|
Date Issued
|
Case Number
|
Topic(s)
|
|
Ionia Public Schools-and-Ionia Education Association |
Unfair Labor Practice Not Found- Employer did not violate § 10(1)(a) or (e) when it failed to hold a "bid-bump" meeting or when it failed to post vacancies for teaching positions in accordance with the parties' expired collective bargaining agreement; Employer has no duty to bargain over decisions about teacher placement as such decisions are prohibited subjects of bargaining under §15(3)(j) of PERA. |
4/22/14
|
C12 G-136 | Duty to Bargain; 2011 PA 103; Prohibited Subjects of Bargaining; §15(3)(j) of PERA; Maintenance of Terms and Conditions after Contract Expiration |
|
Tuscola County Road Commission |
Unit Clarification Petition Dismissed- Unit Clarification is Not Appropriate to Move Established Positions in or out of Bargaining Units Contrary to Bargaining History; The Position in Question was Historically Excluded From Petitioner's Unit; Unit Clarification is used to Resolve Ambiguities Concerning Unit Placement of Newly Created or Recently Substantially Changed Classifications; Petitioner Failed to Allege that the Position had been Recently Substantially Changed. |
4/22/14
|
UC13 H-012 | Unit Clarification; Bargaining History; Summary Disposition |
|
Washtenaw County-and-AFSCME Council 25, Local 3052 |
Motion for Reconsideration Granted- Commission Decision Incorporating Parties Settlement Agreement to Dismiss Unit Clarification Petitions was Vacated; Parties' Jointly Requested that Settlement Agreement Not be Published; Commission Vacated Decision Based on Parties' Joint Request; Unit Clarification Petitions Dismissed with Prejudice. |
4/22/14
|
UC09 J-029 & UC06 J-032-A | Motion for Reconsideration; Unit Clarification |
|
Oakland County –and– Oakland County Employees Union |
Unfair Labor Practice Not Found: Respondent did not Violate its Duty to Bargain by Unilaterally Implementing Unpaid Alternate On-Call System; Charge was Timely as Filed within Six Months of Act Constituting Alleged Violation; Allegation of Mid-term Modification of Prior Letter of Agreement (LOA) Dismissed as Language Previously Interpreted by Arbitrator; Unpaid Alternate On-Call System was Covered by LOA, Employer Had Already Satisfied its Duty to Bargain and Was Entitled to Rely on Arbitrator's Interpretation of LOA; Even if Issue was not Covered by Agreement, Undisputed Facts Establish a Past Practice; Respondent's Implementation of Alternate On-Call Systems was Not a Unilateral Change but Merely Continuation of the Status Quo. |
4/18/14
|
C12 J-209 | Statute of Limitations; Duty to Bargain; Mid-term Modifications; Unilateral Change; Past Practice |
|
Maud Preston Palenske Memorial Library-and-AFSCME Council 25, Local 2757.09 and Local 2757.10 |
Unfair Labor Practice Found- Respondent Repudiated Contract by Refusing to Process Grievance; Charging Party's Notice of Intent to Negotiate was too Ambiguous to Terminate Contract; Grievance Arbitration Provision of Contract is still Binding. |
4/10/14
|
C12 K-223 | Duty to Bargain; Repudiation; Unilateral Change; Grievance Arbitration; Arbitrability |
|
Michigan State Government This page last updated 1/9/2015 |
||||