The web Browser you are currently using is unsupported, and some features of this site may not work as intended. Please update to a modern browser such as Chrome, Firefox or Edge to experience all features Michigan.gov has to offer.
June 2021
Name | Subject Matter | Date Issued | Case Number(s) | Topic(s) |
Wayne State University -and- |
Unfair Labor Practice Not Found: No duty to Bargain Further Where Matter 'Covered By' the Agreement; Parties Each Articulated a Credible Interpretation of the Relevant Contract Language and, Therefore, No Cognizable Claim Under PERA was Stated; Under Such Circumstances, Charging Party is Left to its Contractual Remedies; Given that the Collective Bargaining Agreement Authorized Respondent to Negotiate Directly with Individual Employees, There Can be No Legitimate Claim of Direct Dealing. |
6/1/2021 |
(no exceptions) |
Unilateral Change; Direct Dealing |
City of Farmington Hills -and- American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, Michigan Council 25, Local 1456 -and- Technical, Professional and Office Workers Association of Michigan |
Petition for Election Denied: Commission Found That the Mutually Ratified Agreement Did Not Constitute a Premature Extension Under §14(1). Petitioner Had Opportunity to File During Open Window Period and After Expiration of the First 3 Years of the Initial 5-Year Agreement; The Fact That the Incumbent Union Renegotiated and Ratified a Subsequent Agreement After Expiration of the 3-Year Protected Period of Initial Contract Did Not Meet Definition of a "Premature Extension" Under §14; Commission Dismissed the Rival Union's Representation Petition as Barred and Untimely. |
6/8/2021 | 20-K-1702-RU |
Petition for Election; Premature Extension |
Wayne County |
Petition for Election Denied: A 30-Day Election Bar Existed When the Employer and Incumbent Union Reached a TA on Contract Negotiations on Same Day That a Rival Union Filed a Petition For Representation Election Involving That Same Unit; Due to Processes Used During the Virtual Bargaining Setting Caused by COVID-19, the Parties' TA was Complete and Sufficient to Trigger 30-Day Grace Period; The TA was Fully Ratified and Adopted by the Parties Prior to the Expiration of the 30-Day Grace Period; The Dissent Argued That the TA was Not a Complete Written CBA or Executed By the Authorized Representatives of the Parties as Required By Longstanding Commission Precedent. |
6/8/2021 |
Petition for Election; Contract Bar |
|
City of Detroit -and- ATU Local 26 -and- Frank Lacey | 19-K-2181-CE & 19-K-2182-CU |