The web Browser you are currently using is unsupported, and some features of this site may not work as intended. Please update to a modern browser such as Chrome, Firefox or Edge to experience all features Michigan.gov has to offer.
November 2002
Name
|
Subject Matter
|
Date Issued
|
Case Number
|
Detroit Public Schools -and- Organization of School Administrators and Supervisors |
Unfair Labor Practice Found; Failure to Bargain over Impact of Hiring Decisions on Bargaining Unit Despite Unions Request for Bargaining Is Unfair Labor Practice |
11/25/02
(20 day order) |
C01 K-228 |
Detroit Federation of Teachers -and- Saranne Benson |
Unfair Labor Practice Not Found; Charge that Fringe Benefits Were Negotiated Away Was Filed More Than 6 Months After Benefits Stopped and Was Untimely; Charge That Charging Party was Denied Right to Vote in Union Elections Is Internal Union Matter Beyond MERC Jurisdiction |
11/25/02 (20 day order) |
CU02 F-032 |
Wayne County Community College -and- American Federation of Teachers, Local 2000 -and- Malvern L. Crawford |
Unfair Labor Practice Not Found - Duty of Fair Representation; Union Settled Grievances Because It Reasonably Believed in Good Faith That It Was in Member's Best Interest To Do So; Initial and Ultimate Burden on Member to Show That Settlements Were Unreasonable; Section 11 of PERA Does Not Require a Union to Notify Members Of or Include Them In Grievance Settlement Meetings or Offers |
11/14/02 |
C01 A-21 & CU01 A-4 |
City of Detroit, Detroit Housing Commission -and- American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, Council 25 and Local 23 and 2394 |
Unfair Labor Practice Found-Duty to Bargain; Union Provided No Evidence That Either the DHC or City Refused to Negotiate a Complete Agreement Prior To Separation of DHC from City; No Support in the Record That City Failed to Bargain Over Effects of Decision to Separate Housing Department From City Prior to Its Implementation; No Basis for Direct Dealing Violation As Union Was Kept Informed of Separation Plans and City Repeatedly Reiterated DHC's Commitment to Honor Contract's Successor Clause; City Responded to Union's Information Requests in Untimely Manner, Unlawfully Redacted Names of Employees Who Responded to Offers of Employment, and Refused to Provide Relevant Bumping/Transfer Responses |
11/05/02 (20 day order) |
C01 I-186 |
Michigan State Government This page last updated 02/12/03 |