The web Browser you are currently using is unsupported, and some features of this site may not work as intended. Please update to a modern browser such as Chrome, Firefox or Edge to experience all features Michigan.gov has to offer.
October 2009
Name | Subject Matter | Date Issued | Case Number | Topic(s) |
Argentine Twp -and- Thomas R. Brooks |
Unfair Labor Practice Not Found; Charging Party Failed to State a Claim Under PERA; Charging Party Failed to Respond to Show Cause Order; Failure to Respond to Show Cause Order May Warrant Dismissal of Charge; Charge Failed to Allege Employer Interfered With, Restrained, or Coerced Employee From Engaging in Protected Activities. |
10/20/09 |
C09 H-124 | Failure to State a Claim |
Kalamazoo County -and- Kalamazoo County Sheriff -and- Kalamazoo County Sheriff’s Deputies Association |
Unfair Labor Practice Found -- Respondents Violated Duty to Bargain in Good Faith; Respondents Repudiated Contract Provision; Act 312 Arbitration is a Permissive Subject of Bargaining; Permissive Subjects of Bargaining Embodied in a Collective Bargaining Agreement Cannot be Unilaterally Repudiated; Parties Intent to Settle Successor Agreement by Binding Interest Arbitration Recognized; Parties Agreement to Submit to Act 312 Arbitration Upheld to the Extent that Expenditure of Public Funds is Not Required. |
10/16/09 |
C08 A-019 |
Duty to Bargain; Act 312 eligibility; Permissive Subjects of Bargaining; Repudiation . Cross-Exceptions; Motion to Strike; Timeliness |
Wayne County -and- Joseph Chrapkiewicz |
Charge Withdrawn at Request of Charging Party as Matter has Been Settled. Unfair Labor Practice Not Found-- Charge Failed to Allege Facts that Employer Discriminated Against Charging Party For Engaging In Protected Activities; Charge Barred by the PERA Six-Month Statute of Limitations. |
10/13/09 |
C09 G-113 |
Failure to State a Claim; Statute of Limitations; Withdrawal |
Oakland County Road Commission -and- Michigan AFSCME Council 25, Local 529 |
Charge Withdrawn – Charge Withdrawn Per Request of Charging Party; Parties Settled Underlying Dispute. Unfair Labor Practice Found; Respondent Violated Duty to Bargain in Good Faith; Respondent Failed to Respond to Request for Presumptively Relevant Information; Respondent Had Continuing Duty to Provide Such Information. |
10/13/09 |
C09 F-088 |
Duty to Bargain; Information Request; Withdrawal |
City of Detroit (Police Dept) |
Unfair Labor Practice Not Found – Charging Party Failed to Allege Facts To Support Claim Respondent Repudiated Contract – No Repudiation When Parties Have Bona Fide Dispute Over Contract Interpretation. |
10/07/09 |
C09 F-093 |
Good faith dispute over contract interpretation |
Sandusky Community Schools -and- Sandusky Education Association |
Unfair Labor Practice Found – Respondent Violated Duty to Bargain; Respondent Made Unilateral Changes to Mandatory Subjects of Bargaining after Contract Expiration and in the Absence of Impasse; Parties’ Salary Grid is a Mandatory Subject of Bargaining; Respondent’s Failure to Implement Wage Increases as Required by Salary Grid, prior to Impasse, is a Unilateral Change in Violation of the Duty to Bargain in Good Faith. Unfair Labor Practice Not Found – Surface Bargaining not Established by Charging Party; Good Faith in Bargaining Determined by Totality of Circumstances; Employer’s Position Changed during Negotiations. Employer Communications of Accurate Information about Negotiations to Employees in Non-Coercive Manner is not PERA Violation; Employer’s Communications to Employees were Factually Accurate and Not Coercive. |
10/02/09 |
C08 I-198 & C08 I-201 | Duty to Bargain; Maintenance of Terms and Conditions after Contract Expiration; Unilateral Change; Surface Bargaining; Direct Dealing |
Michigan State Government This page last updated 7/09/12 |