The web Browser you are currently using is unsupported, and some features of this site may not work as intended. Please update to a modern browser such as Chrome, Firefox or Edge to experience all features Michigan.gov has to offer.
Volume 4: Investigative approach for petroleum VIAP
Attachment C.4 - Data collection and evaluation for petroleum sites
If a facility or property is located within the lateral inclusion zone (LIZ) and is not able to be screened out using the vertical separation distances, if a site-specific approach is implemented, or if there are utilities that mobile NAPL may enter and can directly transport vapors to a structure, then data collection is needed to evaluate risks. The data collection should be based on where the vapor source is in relation to the structure and is discussed in detail in the following sections:
- Structure over a Vapor Source (Section C.1.0)
- Vapor Source not in Contact with a Structure (Section C.1.1)
- Vapor Source in Contact with a Structure (Section C.1.2)
- Structure adjacent to a Vapor Source (Section C.2.0)
- Utilities (Section C.3.0)
- C.3.1 Petroleum Vapor Source within Utility Backfill Material (Section C.3.1)
- C.3.2 Petroleum Vapor Source in an Underground Conduit (Section C.3.2)
- Structures are Not Currently Present (Section C.4.0)
Types of Soil Gas Samples
At facilities that don’t screen out, the investigation approach after the vapor source has been adequately delineated will include soil gas sampling. Representative soil gas data allows for better risk-based decisions since soil gas data reflect the processes that are occurring in the vadose zone (e.g., partitioning, sorption, biodegradation) from the vapor source to the overlying receptor at the location being sampled. Three primary options are available for characterizing soil gas which differ by the sampling location relative to the structure under investigation (if present):
- Subslab Soil Gas. These sampling points are located within the footprint of a building and are installed by drilling through the slab. They are not located outside of a building and require an actual structure to be present. Sampling depths are less than 1-foot below the bottom of the slab. They are the most representative and predictive of vapors located beneath the structure and their potential to cause an unacceptable health risk.
NOTE: Subslab soil gas samples are preferred over exterior samples for a PVI building evaluation unless the lateral migration of vapors is being evaluated. More information and methods for collecting soil gas samples and additional factors in sample placement are described in Volume 2 – Investigation Methods for the Volatilization to Indoor Air Pathway (VIAP).
- Exterior Soil Gas. These subsurface sampling points are located at some distance (usually 10 linear feet or more) away from the building. Sample points are installed within the vadose zone and at least 5 feet below the ground surface. Factors considered for selecting sampling depth include (1) fluctuations in water table depth; (2) thickness of capillary fringe; (3) a minimum sampling depth; and (4) depth of the vapor source. See Volume 2 – Investigation Methods for the Volatilization to the Indoor Air Pathway (VIAP) for other depth considerations.
- Near-Slab Soil gas. These subsurface sampling points are located around the perimeter of the building (typically less than 5-feet from a building). In addition to the sampling depth considerations for external soil gas points, building features (such as depth of foundation) should be considered when selecting near-slab sampling depths. Subslab soil gas samples are preferred in evaluating petroleum over near-slab soil gas samples unless lateral migration is being evaluated. Near-slab samples are typically used to evaluate the fill associated with a utility line or the lateral migration of vapors (see C.2.0)
NOTE: Pressure differential readings, as well as O2, CO2, and methane, should be collected prior to any samples being collected to aid in CSM development and to ensure that the pressure gradient is from the subsurface into the structure.
General advantages and disadvantages for each type of vapor sampling method for the investigation of a petroleum release are provided in Table C-1. More information is available in Volume 2 – Investigation Methods for the Volatilization to the Indoor Air Pathway (VIAP).
Table C-1: Advantages and Disadvantages of Various Investigative Strategies
Measurement | Advantages | Disadvantages | Comments |
---|---|---|---|
Subslab soil gas |
|
|
|
Near-Slab Soil Gas (e.g., typically, less than 5 feet from a building) |
|
|
|
Exterior Soil Gas (>5 feet below grade) |
|
|
|
Exterior Shallow Soil Gas (<5-feet below grade) |
|
|
|
Vertical soil gas profiles can be acquired by installing a series of nested or clustered exterior or near-slab soil gas points at a range of depths. Such soil gas data may be useful for defining the zone of active biodegradation and demonstrating that the decrease in PHC concentrations with distance from the source is due to biodegradation. This may be useful in development of site-specific risk evaluations. Additional information on vertical soil gas profiles can be found in Volume 2 – Investigation Methods for the Volatilization to the Indoor Air Pathway (VIAP).