Our new AI chatbot is designed to help you find information more easily on our website. Look for it in the bottom right corner of your screen.
Bureau of Services for Blind Persons
Michigan High-Speed Internet Office
Michigan Rehabilitation Services
Workers' Disability Compensation Agency
Black Leadership Advisory Council
Michigan Community Service Commission
Executive Order 2020-107 established Michigan Workforce Development Board
MiSTEM convenes a statewide network of leaders in education, business and local communities to empower the next generation of innovators.
The Rural Development Fund Board, housed in the Office of Rural Prosperity, has oversight of the Rural Development Fund. The Board is charged with advising the Office on how to distribute tax revenue collected from mines to improve and strengthen local communities. Director is a voting member and makes final decision on projects (Public Act 411 of 2012).
Unemployment Insurance Appeals Commission
formerly MI Compensation Appellate Commission
Search is currently unavailable. Please try again later.
The web Browser you are currently using is unsupported, and some features of this site may not work as intended. Please update to a modern browser such as Chrome, Firefox or Edge to experience all features Michigan.gov has to offer.
| Name | Subject Matter | Date Issued | Case Number(s) | Topic(s) |
| City of Detroit (Fire Department) -and- Detroit Fire Fighters Association,IAFF, Local 344 |
Unfair Labor Practice Not Found: CBA Permitted Respondent to Determine Content and Nature of the Work to be Performed and to Establish and Revise Policies and Procedures; Respondent Exercised its Authority to Determine Scope of Work Performed by Bargaining Unit Members and Added Additional Duties as Allowed by the CBA; Parties' CBA Covered the Matter at Issue and No Violation of Duty to Bargain. | 04/30/2020 | 19-C-0572-CE | Management Rights |
|
City of Detroit (Department of Transportation) |
Unfair Labor Practice Not Found: Commission Did Not Find Merit to Charging Party’s Argument That He Should Have Been Granted an Evidentiary Hearing; No Material Issues of Fact Were in Dispute Therefore, No Evidentiary Hearing Necessary; Respondent Did Not Violate its Duty of Fair Representation by Not Filing a Grievance Over Charging Party’s Suspension as it Did Not Feel the Grievance Would be Meritorious; Failure to State Valid Claim Against the Employer and Summary Dismissal Appropriate. |
4/15/2020 |
|
Evidentiary Hearing; Duty of Fair Representation |