Bureau of Services for Blind Persons
Michigan Career & Technical Institute
Michigan High-Speed Internet Office
Michigan Rehabilitation Services
Workers' Disability Compensation Agency
Black Leadership Advisory Council
Michigan Community Service Commission
Executive Order 2020-107 established Michigan Workforce Development Board
MiSTEM convenes a statewide network of leaders in education, business and local communities to empower the next generation of innovators.
Unemployment Insurance Appeals Commission
formerly MI Compensation Appellate Commission
Search is currently unavailable. Please try again later.
The web Browser you are currently using is unsupported, and some features of this site may not work as intended. Please update to a modern browser such as Chrome, Firefox or Edge to experience all features Michigan.gov has to offer.
| Name | Subject Matter | Date Issued | Case Number(s) | Topic(s) |
| POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION OF MICHIGAN AND LEELANAU COUNTY DEPUTY SHERIFF’S ASSOCIATION -and- LEELANAU COUNTY AND LEELANAU COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE | Unfair Labor Practice Found: Union Violated its Duty to Bargain Under Section 10(3)(d) By Refusing to Execute the CBA Related to a Wage Scale; Burden on the Union to Clarify the Meaning of the Agreement Prior to Ratification, as the Employer Correctly Implemented the Agreed Upon Wage Scale; Act 312 Panel Had No Jurisdiction Over the Contract Dispute, Making the Filing of the Petition a Violation of PERA. | November 15, 2024 | 23-H-1297-CU | Duty to Bargain; Meeting of the Minds; Act 312 Petition Filing |
| INTERURBAN TRANSIT PARTNERSHIP -and- AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION LOCAL 836 | Unfair Labor Practice Found: Respondent Repudiated the Parties’ CBA When it Unilaterally Increased the Wages for a Subset of Bargaining Unit Members; Respondent Failed to Identify Any Portion of the Contract Upon Which it Could Have Reasonably Relied When Making the Decision to Unilaterally Raise Wages for the Technicians, and Therefore, the Dispute Was Not Covered By the Contract; Subject Matter of Case is Not Moot. | November 18, 2024 (No Exceptions) | 22-J-1927-CE | Repudiation; Covered By Doctrine; Mootness |