Bureau of Services for Blind Persons
Michigan Career & Technical Institute
Michigan High-Speed Internet Office
Michigan Rehabilitation Services
Workers' Disability Compensation Agency
Black Leadership Advisory Council
Michigan Community Service Commission
Executive Order 2020-107 established Michigan Workforce Development Board
MiSTEM convenes a statewide network of leaders in education, business and local communities to empower the next generation of innovators.
Unemployment Insurance Appeals Commission
formerly MI Compensation Appellate Commission
Search is currently unavailable. Please try again later.
The web Browser you are currently using is unsupported, and some features of this site may not work as intended. Please update to a modern browser such as Chrome, Firefox or Edge to experience all features Michigan.gov has to offer.
| Name | Subject Matter | Date Issued | Case Number(s) | Topic(s) |
| SENIOR ACCOUNTANTS, ANALYSTS, APPRAISERS ASSOCIATION -and- AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY & MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, MICHIGAN 925 -and- CITY OF DETROIT | Election Directed: SAAA Failed to Present Any Valid Issues or Factual Disputes Warranting a Hearing; SAAA's Challenge to the Adequacy of the Show of Interest, Based on Its Belief That the Unit Description Was Incorrect, Not an Issue That Can be Addressed in a Hearing; Showing of Interest is an Administrative Matter and Cannot be Challenged Once Established. | March 11, 2025 | 24-J-1803-RC | Directed Election; Showing of Interest |
| CITY OF DETROIT (FIRE DEPARTMENT) -and- DETROIT FIRE FIGHTERS ASSOCIATION, INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIRE FIGHTERS (IAFF), LOCAL 344 | Unfair Labor Practice Found: Employer Violated 10(1)(e) by Entering Negotiations With a Closed Mind and Inflexibility to Bargain; Employer’s Failure to Offer an Alternative to Address its Concern About Injured Firefighters Not Having a Financial Advantage Over Those Who Remained Working Did Not Constitute Good Faith Bargaining; Employer Did Not Violate 10(1)(e) By Failing to Timely Respond to the Union’s Information Request, as That Specific Information Request Was Not Mentioned in the Charge and the Parties Agreed That the Matter Had Been Resolved. |
March 14, 2025 | 22-J-1917-CE | Duty to Bargain; Duty to Furnish Information |
| CITY OF DETROIT (FIRE DEPARTMENT) -and- MICHIGAN ASSOCIATION OF FIRE FIGHTERS | Unfair Labor Practice Not Found: Union Failed to Establish That the Change to the Way EMS Overtime Work Was Scheduled Had a Significant Impact on Members of the EMSOA Bargaining Unit; MERC Has Consistently Held That No Violation of the Duty to Bargain Will Be Found if the Work Removed is De Minimis in the Context of the Unit's Overall Workload. |
March 24, 2025 (no exceptions) | 24-E-1010-CE | 10(1)(e) |
| City of Mt. Clemens -and- Governmental Employees Labor Council -and- Deshawn O-Neal | Unfair Labor Practice Not Found: Charging Party’s Claim Against the Employer That He Was Retaliated Against for Reporting Illegal Activity Outside of Commission Jurisdiction; No Evidence the Union Engaged in Any Unlawful Conduct Violative of PERA; Failure to Respond to Show Cause May Warrant Dismissal of Charge. | March 31, 2025 (no exceptions) | 24-K-1953-CE & 24-K-1956-CU | Failure to State Claim; Failure to Respond to Show Cause |