The web Browser you are currently using is unsupported, and some features of this site may not work as intended. Please update to a modern browser such as Chrome, Firefox or Edge to experience all features Michigan.gov has to offer.
October 2004
Name
|
Subject Matter
|
Date Issued
|
Case Number
|
Kentwood Public Schools, -and- Kent County Education Association/Kentwood Education Association, MEA/NEA |
Unfair Labor Practice Not Found - Respondent Was Entitled to Follow Parties' Past Practice Since No Agreement Was Reached; Respondent's Declaration of Impasse Did Not Constitute Bad Faith Because Parties Continued to Bargain; Charging Party Failed to Present Sufficient Evidence to Establish Violation of Duty to Bargain. otions Hereby Rendered Moot. |
10/08/04 (20 day order) |
C03 E-110 & C03 E-120 |
City of Pontiac, -and- Pontiac Police Officers Association, -and- Gene J. Maxam |
Unfair Labor Practice Not Found - Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted; Charge Against Employer Failed to Allege Discrimination Due to Protected Activity; Union Did Not Violate Duty of Fair Representation; Charge Against Union Failed to Allege that Union Represented Charging Party Arbitrarily, Discriminatorily, or In Bad Faith. |
10/08/04 (20 day order) |
C04 E-126 & CU04 F-030 |
Wayne County Community College District, -and- Wayne County Community College District Professional & Administrative Association/Michigan Federation of Teachers, Local 4467 |
Unfair Labor Practice Not Found - Charge Not Filed Within Six-Month Statute of Limitations. |
10/08/04 (20 day order) |
C04 F-148 |
Suburban Mobility Authority Regional Transportation, -and- Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 1564, -and- Monica L.B. Johnson |
Unfair Labor Practice Not Found - Charging Party Failed to Show Employer Discharged Her Due to Anti-Union Animus and Failed to Show a Her Discharge Was Connected to Protected Activity; Union Did Not Breach Duty of Fair Representation; Union Represented Charging Party at Each Step of the Grievance Process; Individual Members Do Not Have a Right to Demand Their Grievance Be Processed to Arbitration; Union Did Not Breach Duty of Fair Representation by Settling Charging Party's Suspension Grievance. |
10/15/04 (20 day order) |
C03 A-013 & CU03 A-004 |
Bureau of Employment Relations This page last updated 12/15/04 |