The web Browser you are currently using is unsupported, and some features of this site may not work as intended. Please update to a modern browser such as Chrome, Firefox or Edge to experience all features Michigan.gov has to offer.
April 2016
Name |
Subject Matter |
Date Issued |
Case Number |
Topic(s) |
City of Lansing -and- Teamsters Local 580 |
Unfair Labor Practice Not Found: Charging Party’s Allegation Regarding Respondent’s Failure to Abide by Grievance Decision was Not Filed Within the Commission’s Strict Six Month Statue of Limitations; Charging Party Failed to Establish Prima Facie Case of Discrimination or Retaliation by Respondent for Delaying Transfer of Bargaining Unit Member; Charging Party Failed to Establish that Respondent Unreasonably Delayed in Providing Information Requested by Charging Party. |
4/20/2016 |
(20 Day Order) |
Statute of Limitations; Discrimination; Information Request |
36th District Court -and- AFSCME Council 25 and its Affiliated Local 917 |
Unfair Labor Practice Charge Withdrawn as Parties Reached Agreement and Agreed to Withdrawal of Charge. | 4/19/2016 | C13 I-163 | Withdrawal Request |
Macomb County -and- Police Officers Association of Michigan -and- UAW Local 412, Unit 75 |
Petition for Unit Clarification Denied: Commission Denied Petitioner’s Request to Clarify its Bargaining Unit of Nonsupervisory Employees to Include Training and Safety Coordinator Position in Bargaining Unit; Position was “Borderline” Supervisory in Nature such that it Would be Inappropriate to Place in Petitioner’s Bargaining Unit of Nonsupervisory Positions. |
4/14/2016 |
|
Unit Clarification;
Newly Created Position; Supervisory v. Nonsupervisory Positions |
Grand Rapids Community Schools -and- Andres Santiago |
Unfair Labor Practice Not Found: Failure to State Valid PERA Claim; Charging Party’s Allegations of Contract Violations are Insufficient Grounds for Establishing Unfair Labor Practice Charge Against Respondent; Respondent Did Not Violate Charging Party’s Weingarten Rights by Meeting with Him Without His Union Representative, as Meeting Was Not to Interrogate or Investigate; Employee Has a Right to Union Representation at Interview Only When Employee Believes the Interview May Lead to Discipline. |
4/14/2016 | C15 D-052 | Failure to State Claim; Weingarten Rights |