Our new AI chatbot is designed to help you find information more easily on our website. Look for it in the bottom right corner of your screen.
May 2020
| Name | Subject Matter | Date Issued | Case Number(s) | Topic(s) |
| City of Bay City -and- Utility Workers Union of America, AFL-CIO, Local 542 |
Unfair Labor Practice Not Found: No Significant Impact on the Bargaining Unit After Respondent Implemented Electronic Pay Statements; Longstanding Commission Precedent Has Held That it is a Prerogative of Management to Apply Technological Advances in the Public Sector Workplace and That Such Application is Not a Mandatory Subject of Bargaining; The Parties Successor CBA Contained a Provision Which Required All Employees to Utilize Direct Payroll Deposit; When the Matter is Covered by the Agreement, Further Bargaining on That Subject is Foreclosed Because the Parties Have Fulfilled Their Statutory Duty to Bargain; In His Dissent, Commission Chair Bagenstos Found the Pay Statement Issue to be a Mandatory Subject of Bargaining and That by Failing to Bargain with Charging Party, Respondent Violated PERA. |
05/14/2020 | C18 G-067 | Duty to Bargain; Management Rights; Subjects of Bargaining |