The web Browser you are currently using is unsupported, and some features of this site may not work as intended. Please update to a modern browser such as Chrome, Firefox or Edge to experience all features Michigan.gov has to offer.
January 2026
| Name | Subject Matter | Date Issued | Case Number(s) | Topic(s) |
| SEIU HEALTHCARE MICHIGAN -and- MAKAYLA ROBINSON | Unfair Labor Practice Not Found: Charging Party Not Represented by SEIU and Therefore, SEIU Owes No Duty of Fair Representation to Her; Failure to Respond to Show Cause Order May Warrant Dismissal of Charge. |
January 9, 2026 (no exceptions) | 25-E-0934-CU | Failure to State Claim; Failure to Respond to Show Cause Order |
| 38TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT -and- UNITED AUTO WORKERS, LOCAL 723 | Unfair Labor Practice Found: The Record Overwhelmingly Established That the Monroe County Friend of the Court Engaged in Conduct Violative of 10(1)(a), Including Making Various Threats Regarding Union Representatives and Expressing Her Desire to Engage in Acts of Physical Violence; A Reasonable Employee Would Interpret Such Remarks as a Threat to Retaliate Against Charging Party Representatives For Prosecuting Grievances on Behalf of the Union; The Employer Also Violated 10(1)(a) By Relocating Offices of Union Members Closer to the Friend of the Court as Retribution for the Presentation of Grievances; A Reasonable Employee Would Construe That Their Protected Activities Were Under Surveillance in Violation of PERA. | January 9, 2026 (no exceptions) | 24-J-1826-CE | 10(1)(a); Surveillance |
| SEIU LOCAL 517M -and- JANICE COSEY -and- JOEY COMBS | Unfair Labor Practice Not Found: The Suspension and Removal of Charging Parties From Their Positions as Elected Officers of the Union are Internal Union Matters Outside the Scope of PERA; The Gag Order Issued By the Union Did Not Impact Charging Parties Right to Engage in Protected Activities and Did Not Violate PERA. | January 30, 2026 (no exceptions) | 25-K-1625-CU | Internal Union Matters; Gag Order |