The web Browser you are currently using is unsupported, and some features of this site may not work as intended. Please update to a modern browser such as Chrome, Firefox or Edge to experience all features Michigan.gov has to offer.
May 2002
Name
|
Subject Matter
|
Date Issued
|
Case Number
|
Clairmount Laundry, Inc. -and- Chicago & Central States Joint Board, UNITE, AFL-CIO |
Unfair Labor Practice Found; Broad cease and desist order warranted by Respondent's egregious misconduct; Respondent discharged employee for employee's involvement in protected concerted activity; Respondent failed to respond to Union's request for relevant information |
5/21/02
(20 day order) |
C01 J-207 |
United Steelworkers of America, Local 14317 -and- Richard T. Murray and Ronald Sturgeon |
No Breach of Duty of Fair Representation; An employee does not have an absolute right to have his grievance taken to arbitration; Union's decision not to advance Charging Parties' grievances to arbitration was reasonable; Union's withdrawal of unfair labor practice charge did not breach duty of fair representation; Bargaining unit members have no standing to dictate which charges their union should litigate |
5/21/02
(20 day order) |
CU01 H-043 |
United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO, CLC, and its Local 15157 -and- Laura Herek, et al |
No Breach of Duty of Fair Representation; Union did not breach duty of fair representation by entering agreement to add position to bargaining unit without first consulting with union membership |
5/21/02
(20 day order) |
CU01 H-049 |
Mosaica Academy of Saginaw -and- Michigan Education Association |
Unfair Labor Practice Not Found - Evidence Insufficient to Establish That Employee Was Discharged for Union or Concerted Activity; Charging Party Failed to Establish That Employer Interfered with Section 9 Rights of Employees |
5/20/02 (20 day order) |
C00 E-89 |
Detroit Public Schools -and- Greater Detroit Building Trades Council -and- Debra Williams |
No Breach of Duty of Fair Representation; Union's Alleged Failure to Provide Charging Party with Opportunity to Dispute or Verify Results of Union's Investigation of Grievance Was Not a Breach of Union's Duty of Fair Representation |
5/17/02 |
C01 D-70 & CU01 D-25 |
Police Officers Labor Council, Local 355 -and- Morris Cotton |
No Breach of Duty of Fair Representation - Where Grievance Remains Active After Expiration of Time Limit for Employer's Response, Union May Wait for Employer's Response Before Deciding Whether to Take Grievance to Next Level; Union Did Not Breach Duty of Fair Representation by Waiting for Employer's Response to Grievance Before Petitioning for Arbitration |
5/17/02 |
CU00 J-38 |
Bureau of Employment Relations This page last updated 06/14/02 |