The web Browser you are currently using is unsupported, and some features of this site may not work as intended. Please update to a modern browser such as Chrome, Firefox or Edge to experience all features Michigan.gov has to offer.
April 2003
Name
|
Subject Matter
|
Date Issued
|
Case Number
|
Teamsters State, County & Municipal Workers, Local 214 -and- Oree Rhodes, III |
Unfair Labor Practice Not Found; Union Acted Rationally in Withdrawing Employee's Grievance Against his Employer Regarding his Termination due to Absenteeism and Tardiness, Employee Offered no Exculpatory Evidence for Behavior |
4/18/03
(20 day order) |
CU01 K-061 |
Macomb Community College -and- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (UAW) and its affiliated local, Macomb College Association of Administrative Personnel, Local 2411 |
Unfair Labor Practice Found- Employer Breached Duty to Bargain by Refusing to Recognize Affiliate of Union as Exclusive Bargaining Unit When Relying on Mistaken Belief That Affiliation Election Must be Supervised by MERC, Refusing to Recognize Affiliation not Legitimate Method of Addressing Such Disputes, Parties Cannot Bargain Over Obligation for Employer to Recognize Bargaining Unit; Record Not Reopened When Party had Chance to Refute Other Party's Documents at Original Hearing |
4/4/03
|
C01 B-44 |
Buena Vista Schools -and- Buena Vista Education Association, MEA/NEA |
Unfair Labor Practice Not Found - Employer's Letter not Evidence of Hostility Towards Employee's Union Activities, No Violation of Duty to Bargain When Bargaining Unit did not Demand Negotiation; Unfair Labor Practice Found - Violation of Duty to Bargain when Employer Unilaterally Implements Stipends Without Notifying Bargaining Unit; Employer has Duty to Bargain with Substitute Teachers who Teach for More than 60 days in Same School Year |
4/4/03 (20 day order) |
C02 B-051 |
Lake Erie Transportation Commission -and- Jack A. Fleeman |
Unfair Labor Practice Not Found - Evidence of Anti-union Animus as Motive for Employee's Suspension; Pro Per Employee's Claim that Lack of Knowledge of Procedure Impaired His Ability to Represent Himself Denied - Proper Employee is Responsible for Knowing Procedure; Exceptions Not Filed in Compliance of Procedure Rules Not Considered |
4/2/03
|
C02 B-048 |
Bureau of Employment Relations This page last updated 05/23/03 |