The web Browser you are currently using is unsupported, and some features of this site may not work as intended. Please update to a modern browser such as Chrome, Firefox or Edge to experience all features Michigan.gov has to offer.
November 2014
Name
|
Subject Matter
|
Date Issued
|
Case Number
|
Topic(s)
|
Muskegon Public Schools -and- Muskegon Education Association -and- Norma T. Koehler |
Unfair Labor Practice Not Found: Charges Dismissed as Moot; Respondent Employer Rescinded Charging Party's Layoff Notice; No PERA Violation by Alleged Refusal to Permit Charging Party to Take Skills Test. |
11/26/14 (20 Day Order)
|
C14 G-084 & CU14 G-036 |
Duty to Bargain; Summary Disposition; Moot |
Utica Education Association -and- Liza Parkinson -and- Lawanda Parker |
Unfair Labor Practice Not Found: Failure to State Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted; Failure to Present Disputed Facts Demonstrating Need For Evidentiary Hearing; No Authority under PERA to Permit Action Against an Individual Union Officer; Internal Union Matters Fall Outside Scope of PERA. |
11/26/14 (20 Day Order)
|
CU 14 E-030 | Duty of Fair Representation; Failure to State Claim; Internal Union Matter |
Schoolcraft County and the Schoolcraft County Sheriff -and- Schoolcraft County Deputy Sheriff's Association |
Unfair Labor Practice Found: Respondent Violated Duty to Bargain by Unilaterally Deducting the Full Increase in the Cost of Pension Benefits from Charging Party's Members Paychecks After Contract Expiration; 2011 PA 54 Requires Public Employers to Pass on to Employees Increases in Insurance Costs that Occur After Contract Expiration, Not Increases in the Costs of Maintaining Other Benefits. |
11/24/14
|
C12 L-234 | Duty to Bargain; 2011 PA 54; Unilateral Change |
West Iron County Public Schools -and- West Iron County Educational Support Personnel Association, |
Unfair Labor Practice Not Found: Respondent Did Not Violate Duty to Bargain by Increasing Health Care Premiums and Implementing the Hard Cap Option Under § 3 of Act 152; Respondent's Choice of Cost Sharing Options Under Act 152 is a Permissive Subject of Bargaining, and therefore, Respondent is Not Required to Bargain with Charging Party Over its Choice of Health Care Options; The Parties' Participation in Fact Finding Does Not Require Respondent to Delay Timely Compliance with Act 152. |
11/21/14
|
C12 F-115 | Duty to Bargain; 2011 PA 152; Permissive Subjects of Bargaining; Fact Finding |
Port Huron Area School District -and-Port Huron Education Association |
Unfair Labor Practice Not Found: Employer Did Not Violate § 10(1)(e) When It Used St. Clair County Regional Services Association (RESA) to Perform Bargaining Unit Work Formerly Performed by School Psychologists; Employer Did Not Violate Duty to Bargain by Refusing to Provide Charging Party Accurate and Timely Information About Alleged Subcontracting of Unity Work, or Violate PERA by Conspiring with the RESA to Privatize Instructional Bargaining Unit Work. |
11/19/14
|
C10 J-255 | Duty to Bargain; Mandatory Subjects of Bargaining; Subcontracting; Information Request. |
City of Southfield -and- Southfield Police Officers Association, et al. |
Unfair Labor Practice Not Found: Employer Did Not Violate § 10(1)(e) By Unilaterally Implementing Increased Health Insurance Premium Rates on January 1, 2012 in Compliance with 2011 PA 152; Public Employer's Choice Between Hard Caps and 80% Employer Share Under PA 152 is a Policy Decision to be Made by Public Employer, and Not a Mandatory Subject of Bargaining; Employer Had Reasonable Basis for Believing That January 1, 2012 Was the Beginning of Benefit Plan Coverage Year, and Therefore Did Not Breach its Duty to Bargain by Implementing Cost Sharing on That Date. |
11/18/14
|
C11 L-220 & C11 L-223 & C11 L-224 & C11 L-225 |
Duty to Bargain; 2011 PA 152; Mandatory Subjects of Bargaining; Permissive Subjects of Bargaining. |
36th District Court -and- AFSCME Council 25 and its Affiliated Local 3308 |
Unfair Labor Practice Not Found: Respondent Did Not Violate Duty to Bargain in Good Faith by Failing to Provide Charging Party Names, Job Titles or Individual Salaries of Appointees; Respondent Only Required to Disclose Information on Non-Unit Members if Relevant to Union in Carrying Out Statutory Duties; Information Charging Party Requested Would Not Have Assisted in Evaluating Respondent's True Economic Condition. |
11/14/14 |
C13 H-155 | Duty to Bargain; Summary Disposition; Information Request |
Detroit Federation of Teachers -and- Dennis Cotton |
No Unfair Labor Practice Found: Respondent Lacked Legal Authority to File Grievance Over Teacher Placement or Performance Evaluations Pursuant to §15(3) of PERA; Failure to State Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted Under PERA; Failure to Timely File Unfair Labor Practice Charge |
11/14/14 |
CU14 E-029 |
Duty of Fair Representation; §15(3) of PERA; Failure to State Claim; Statue of Limitations |
AFSCME Council 24, Local 2394 -and- Neil Sweat |
Denied Motion for Reconsideration: Charging Party Failed to Set Forth Grounds for Reconsideration |
11/14/14 |
CU10 I-039 | Motion for Reconsideration |
Michigan State Government This page last updated 1/9/2015 |